After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 359125 - crash in Time and Date: I was attempting to pres...
crash in Time and Date: I was attempting to pres...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 351603
Product: gnome-system-tools
Classification: Deprecated
Component: time-admin
2.15.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Carlos Garnacho
Carlos Garnacho
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-10-02 21:25 UTC by Michael R Head
Modified: 2006-10-03 00:44 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16


Description Michael R Head 2006-10-02 21:25:22 UTC 
Version: 2.15.4

What were you doing when the application crashed?
I was attempting to press the button that would pop up the time zone selector in Date and Time preferences. This'll be a dupe of the other one that's about to be sent due to bug-buddy thinking I wasn't connected to the network because networkmanager wasn't controlling the network device.


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.0 2006-09-04 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 37040128 vsize: 0 resident: 37040128 share: 0 rss: 14385152 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1159824231 rtime: 0 utime: 168 stime: 0 cutime:160 cstime: 0 timeout: 8 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/time-admin'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1225664848 (LWP 7097)]
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 74154

Thread 1 (Thread -1225664848 (LWP 7097))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 ??
  • #5 ??
  • #6 ??
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall 






Comment 1


Karsten Bräckelmann





          2006-10-03 00:44:56 UTC
        



Thanks for all these details. :)

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 351603 ***