After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 357888 - new contacts not available from address book
new contacts not available from address book
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 338710
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Contacts
2.6.x (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-addressbook-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-09-26 22:28 UTC by cummings
Modified: 2006-09-27 14:06 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.11/2.12



Description cummings 2006-09-26 22:28:59 UTC
Please describe the problem:
I have added some new contacts to my address book, and when I click on Contacts, I see the new entries within the list.  However, if I go to the Mail program, begin to compose a new e-mail, and click on the To: button, the newer contacts are not shown in the list of possible addresses.  It seems like the Mail program is somehow not seeing the current updated list of Contacts.  

By the way, I only have one single Contacts list with 60 entries in it, so this is not a matter of the contacts somehow being added to a different list.

Steps to reproduce:
1. Add new contact to addressbook.
2. Begin to compose an e-mail.
3. Click on To: button to access contacts list.


Actual results:
I do not see the newly added contact among the list of possible addresses.

Expected results:
I would expect to see all contacts in the list, including any newly added ones.

Does this happen every time?
Yes.

Other information:
Comment 1 André Klapper 2006-09-27 14:06:09 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.

This has been fixed in a lter release, please update.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 338710 ***