After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 355241 - crash in Time and Date: Installation, trying to ...
crash in Time and Date: Installation, trying to ...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 351603
Product: gnome-system-tools
Classification: Deprecated
Component: time-admin
2.15.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Carlos Garnacho
Carlos Garnacho
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-09-10 08:21 UTC by mimi.doucet
Modified: 2006-09-10 14:37 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16


Description mimi.doucet 2006-09-10 08:21:54 UTC 
Version: 2.15.2

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Installation, trying to get the actual hour


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.15.92 2006-08-22 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.15.92

Memory status: size: 35799040 vsize: 0 resident: 35799040 share: 0 rss: 14860288 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1157883661 rtime: 0 utime: 77 stime: 0 cutime:70 cstime: 0 timeout: 7 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/time-admin'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1225025872 (LWP 6842)]
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 72028

Thread 1 (Thread -1225025872 (LWP 6842))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 dbus_error_has_name
    from /usr/lib/libdbus-1.so.3
  • #5 dbus_error_has_name
    from /usr/lib/libdbus-1.so.3
  • #6 dbus_message_iter_get_basic
    from /usr/lib/libdbus-1.so.3
  • #7 ??
  • #8 ??
  • #9 ??
  • #10 ??
  • #11 ??
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall 






Comment 1


Rob Bradford





          2006-09-10 14:37:19 UTC
        




*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 351603 ***