Bug 354877 – crash in Shared Folders: Trying to add a shared f...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 354877 - crash in Shared Folders: Trying to add a shared f...


Summary:	crash in Shared Folders: Trying to add a shared f...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 351376

Product:	gnome-system-tools
Classification:	Deprecated
Component:	shares-admin
Version:	2.15.x
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Carlos Garnacho
QA Contact:	Carlos Garnacho

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2006-09-08 01:13 UTC by joverstreet1
Modified:	2006-09-08 15:23 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description joverstreet1 2006-09-08 01:13:26 UTC

Version: 2.15.3

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Trying to add a shared folder after having installed SAMBA		


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.0 2006-09-04 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 69492736 vsize: 0 resident: 69492736 share: 0 rss: 14503936 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1157677904 rtime: 0 utime: 95 stime: 0 cutime:90 cstime: 0 timeout: 5 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/shares-admin'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1225262912 (LWP 4398)]
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 71856

Thread 1 (Thread -1225262912 (LWP 4398))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 ??
#5 ??
#6 ??
#7 ??
#8 gtk_window_set_title
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#9 ??
#10 ??
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Sebastien Bacher 2006-09-08 15:23:18 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 351376 ***