After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 349025 - Code Block Display & Selection
Code Block Display & Selection
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 96436
Product: gedit-plugins
Classification: Other
Component: General
2.14.x
Other All
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Gedit maintainers
Gedit maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-07-28 02:05 UTC by tomás pollak
Modified: 2019-03-23 20:46 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: Unversioned Enhancement



Description tomás pollak 2006-07-28 02:05:38 UTC
Hello,

Just a small feature request.

Is there any chance you could block display for code editing in Gedit?
I'm currently using Gedit for PHP and Javascript coding, and I really
miss this feature, since it really helps in managing classes and
functions in the code.

Kate does have this one, but there's no chance I'm gonna install all K
and QT dependencies just to have block display.

Another good thing would be to be able to select whole blocks in a
nested way, perhaps by showing the different blocks in a cascading way
in a bar at the bottom (like the DOM inspector in Firefox). If you've
ever used Dreamweaver in code editing mode you will know what I mean.

Something like this (in case it's HTML):

<body> <div #main> <div .entry> <span .title>

And if you click on any of these "buttons", you could automatically
select all the text that's inside that block.

I hope I made myself clear. I believe these additions would enhace
Gedit a lot. Perhaps the best way is to make them through a plugin, that way if you don't use Gedit for coding, you don't have to load inneccesary stuff.
Comment 1 Paolo Borelli 2009-01-02 14:14:03 UTC
Ops... seems this bug report was never triaged, sorry about that. Anyway it's something that needs to be done in gtk

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 96436 ***