After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 345333 - A/P reports show wrong ageing totals
A/P reports show wrong ageing totals
Status: VERIFIED OBSOLETE
Product: GnuCash
Classification: Other
Component: Business
1.8.x
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Derek Atkins
Derek Atkins
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-06-19 17:09 UTC by Maf. King
Modified: 2018-06-29 21:08 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
Sample Data file (23.97 KB, application/x-gnucash)
2006-06-19 17:12 UTC, Maf. King
Details

Description Maf. King 2006-06-19 17:09:20 UTC
Please describe the problem:
Invoices for a given customer can be made to give incorrect totals.
this makes reports wrong, and in the case of A/P, causes the 
"Bills Due Reminder" dialog to show bogus data.

Steps to reproduce:
1. Create an invoice from a vendor.
2. Create a second invoice from that vendor, dated a little later
3. Pay the second invoice
4. Unpost, alter and repost the first invoice



Actual results:
Vendor report and Bills Due reminder show bogus data.  Payable Aging does not show the same data as Vendor report.

Expected results:
Reports should show accurate totals

Does this happen every time?
Seems To.

Other information:
Sample datafile available, with broken transactions in it.
Comment 1 Maf. King 2006-06-19 17:12:45 UTC
Created attachment 67644 [details]
Sample Data file 

File to illustrate the problem in the A/P totalling etc.
Sequence of actions is
Invoice1 created, Invoice2 Created, Invoice1 paid, Invoice3 created,
Invoice3 paid, Invoice2 altered.
Comment 2 Maf. King 2006-06-19 17:19:34 UTC
The problem can be cleared by deleting the payments (checking register), deleting the Auto Payment Forward (AP register), then re-paying the bills. (Bill->ProcessPayment)
Comment 3 Christian Stimming 2006-09-13 13:22:41 UTC
Development on 1.8.x has stopped and this versions won't be maintained anymore. Does this problem still occur in 2.0.x versions of gnucash?
Comment 4 Maf. King 2006-09-14 11:10:54 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> Development on 1.8.x has stopped and this versions won't be maintained anymore.
> Does this problem still occur in 2.0.x versions of gnucash?
> 

Seems to be fixed in 2.0.1, with the ability to pay bills out of order.
Thanks,
Maf.
Comment 5 John Ralls 2018-06-29 21:08:24 UTC
GnuCash bug tracking has moved to a new Bugzilla host. This bug has been copied to https://bugs.gnucash.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345333. Please update any external references or bookmarks.