After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 344990 - gtkmm-2.9.4 does not build against gtk+-2.9.3
gtkmm-2.9.4 does not build against gtk+-2.9.3
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gtkmm
Classification: Bindings
Component: build
2.9.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: gtkmm-forge
gtkmm-forge
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-06-15 13:07 UTC by Joseph Sacco
Modified: 2006-06-20 11:31 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Joseph Sacco 2006-06-15 13:07:39 UTC 
gtkmm-2.9.4 does not build against gtk+-2.9.3. Hopefully, gtkmm-2.9.5 will be released soon.

-Joseph
Comment 1 Joseph Sacco 2006-06-17 14:36:54 UTC 
The code in CVS [as of 13jun] builds.

-Joseph
Comment 2 Elijah Newren 2006-06-17 15:21:30 UTC 
No it doesn't (bug 344788, bug 344787, bug 344771, bug 344786, and bug 344789 -- most of which have been fixed since 13jun, though).
Comment 3 Joseph Sacco 2006-06-17 17:46:18 UTC 
I used the Changelog to determine the date, which was not a good idea. I am actually using code from 15June, which does build on my system. 'make distcheck' even works. 

That being said, the important question is "When will gtkmm-2.9.5" be released?"


-Joseph
Comment 4 Elijah Newren 2006-06-17 20:09:55 UTC 
As per comments in bug 344788, it appears that it is more likely to build with gcc-4.x as gtkmm's autogen only automatically turns on errors for warnings when building with gcc-3.x.  This seems to explain why I couldn't get it to build without lots of little patches (though they are all relatively trivial), and the reason you probably could get it to build.  But yeah, I agree with you on when-will-next-release-be-available as being the important question for this bug.  :)
Comment 5 Murray Cumming 2006-06-19 07:25:35 UTC 
I'll try to do a release soon. I thought the main problem was that current cvs would not build with the latest gtk+ tarball, but maybe I'm wrong.
Comment 6 Murray Cumming 2006-06-19 17:31:09 UTC 
Hopefully we'll have more luck with 2.9.5, though I haven't tested it against a tarball yet. I'd appareciate it if you could.
Comment 7 Murray Cumming 2006-06-20 07:02:37 UTC 
Apparently gtkmm 2.9.5 builds fine with the latest GTK+ tarball. Thanks for all the fixes and feeback.
Comment 8 Joseph Sacco 2006-06-20 11:31:08 UTC 
It does... You are welcome.

-Joseph