After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 341854 - Verification of Xtst, Xdamage and Xfixes aren't done correct
Verification of Xtst, Xdamage and Xfixes aren't done correct
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gnome-mag
Classification: Deprecated
Component: magnifier-utility
0.12.x
Other Linux
: Normal major
: ---
Assigned To: Carlos Eduardo Rodrigues Diógenes
bill.haneman
: 316485 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-05-15 13:21 UTC by Carlos Eduardo Rodrigues Diógenes
Modified: 2006-07-20 22:57 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
this patch call AC_DEFINE in a condition that is not verified (1.41 KB, patch)
2006-05-15 13:32 UTC, Carlos Eduardo Rodrigues Diógenes 		accepted-commit_now Details | Review

Description Carlos Eduardo Rodrigues Diógenes 2006-05-15 13:21:32 UTC 
In some distributions, for me it's happened in Ubuntu 5.10, the Xtst, Xdamage and Xfixes are detected in the system, but the the AC_DEFINE ins't called in the configure script, so, if these extensions are correctly instaled, they are not used.
Comment 1 Carlos Eduardo Rodrigues Diógenes 2006-05-15 13:32:00 UTC 
Created attachment 65500 [details] [review]
this patch call AC_DEFINE in a condition that is not verified

I don't know exactly what is the behavior of AC_CHECK_LIB, but I think that it's initially search for libs in the default lib directory and in Ubuntu 5.10 is in this directory where the Xtst, Xdamage and Xfixes are, so in the first if the condition is FALSE and the code that calls AC_DEFINE is  never called.
Comment 2 Carlos Eduardo Rodrigues Diógenes 2006-05-15 17:44:24 UTC 
Fixed in CVS. The fix will go into the next patch release. Thank you for your bug report.
Fixed in the development version. The fix will be available in the next major release. Thank you for your bug report.
Comment 3 Carlos Eduardo Rodrigues Diógenes 2006-07-20 22:57:40 UTC 
*** Bug 316485 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***