After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 337345 - Not all of the appointment created in current month can be print previewed.
Not all of the appointment created in current month can be print previewed.
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 321807
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Calendar
2.6.x (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-calendar-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-04-05 11:21 UTC by ShiPu
Modified: 2006-04-06 14:18 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.13/2.14



Description ShiPu 2006-04-05 11:21:56 UTC
Please describe the problem:
As we know, under month view condition, calendar would do print preview job by
the unit of month.
If the appointments in the month which you choose to print preview are not shown
in monitor, they would not be print previewed too.

Steps to reproduce:
1. Launch -> Evolution
2. Goto "Calendar" -> Create some appoinment
	   for example: 6 appoinments : 1 appoinment on the  2nd of March,
					1 appoinment on the 15th of March,
					1 appoinment on the 30th of March,
					1 appoinment on the  2nd of April,
					1 appoinment on the 15th of April,
					1 appoinment on the 30th of April,

3. Choose "View" by "Month" -> Drag down until you can see the entire month of
April.
4. Click on the 30th of March Calendar box.
5. Goto "File" -> "Print Preview"


Actual results:
Only appointment that displayed in the monitor get previewed.

Expected results:
All of the appoinment in March is previewed.

Does this happen every time?
yes

Other information:
Comment 1 André Klapper 2006-04-05 16:51:18 UTC
shipu, do you think this is a duplicate of bug 321807?
Comment 2 Xiurong Simon Zheng 2006-04-06 03:45:39 UTC
Andre, this's a duplicate of bug 321807.
Comment 3 André Klapper 2006-04-06 14:18:51 UTC
ok, simonz, feel free to mark it as a duplicate yourself (if you have the appropriate bugzilla edit permissions, don't know)

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 321807 ***