After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 334719 - Can not print with landscape orientation
Can not print with landscape orientation
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 358773
Product: Gnumeric
Classification: Applications
Component: Printing
1.6.x
Other Linux
: Normal major
: ---
Assigned To: Andreas J. Guelzow
Jody Goldberg
: 337696 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-03-16 03:33 UTC by Andy Gower
Modified: 2006-10-01 15:45 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Andy Gower 2006-03-16 03:33:03 UTC
Trying to print a sheet in landscape orientation does not seem to work.

1.  Have spreadsheet.
2.  Goto page setup.
3.  Change page orientation to Landscape.
4.  Click on OK to accept.
5.  Goto print preview.
6.  Page appears in landscape mode, but text/data appears in portrait mode.
7.  Close print preview.  Goto page setup.
8.  Change feed orientation to Rotated 90 Degrees.
9.  Goto print preview.
10. Text/data now appears to be printing correctly.
11. Goto print (whether to physical printer [Samsung ML-2010] or PDF file) and page will print incorrectly in portrait mode.

Maybe there's something I'm missing here, but it should be easier to print in landscape.  Thanks for reading.
Comment 1 Andreas J. Guelzow 2006-03-16 05:21:06 UTC
This appears to be 301494. Which (exact) version are you using?
Comment 2 Andy Gower 2006-03-16 06:04:12 UTC
I'm using Debian package 1.6.2-3.

The other bug report shows the bug as being Fixed in the CVS version, but the instructions provided in the bug comments do not fix the problem on my version.  Perhaps CVS has a more recent version (1.7.x?) without the bug?
Comment 3 Andreas J. Guelzow 2006-06-24 18:55:08 UTC
*** Bug 337696 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Andreas J. Guelzow 2006-10-01 15:45:42 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 358773 ***