After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 330283 - Song order reversed when using "Add to play queue" in context menu
Song order reversed when using "Add to play queue" in context menu
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: rhythmbox
Classification: Other
Component: User Interface
0.9.3
Other All
: Normal minor
: ---
Assigned To: RhythmBox Maintainers
RhythmBox Maintainers
: 332389 335439 336125 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-02-07 15:32 UTC by Alasdair North
Modified: 2006-03-26 23:13 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Alasdair North 2006-02-07 15:32:51 UTC
Please describe the problem:
The order of songs in a selected list is reversed when using the context menu.
This does not happen if you simply drag and drop.

Steps to reproduce:
1. Go to Library and use the browser to make just one album visible.
2. Select all the songs in the album.
3. Right click and select "Add to play queue" from the drop down menu.
4. Now look at your queue, the order of tracks should have been reversed.
5. Try the same but instead of using the context menu drag the songs into the
queue, they will be in the correct order.


Actual results:


Expected results:
The tracks should be added to the queue in the same order as they are in the
library.

Does this happen every time?
Yes.

Other information:
I'm using 0.9.3.1
Comment 1 Jonathan Matthew 2006-02-11 11:02:53 UTC
2006-02-11  Jonathan Matthew  <jonathan@kaolin.wh9.net>

        * widgets/rb-entry-view.c: (rb_entry_view_get_selected_entries):
        Reverse the selection list before returning it, so we get it in the
        right order.  Fixes #330283 and some other weirdness.
Comment 2 James "Doc" Livingston 2006-02-24 01:01:18 UTC
*** Bug 332389 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Alex Lancaster 2006-03-22 02:45:09 UTC
*** Bug 335439 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 James "Doc" Livingston 2006-03-26 23:13:53 UTC
*** Bug 336125 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***