After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 326964 - Update a recurring appointment and apply to all instances delete them
Update a recurring appointment and apply to all instances delete them
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Calendar
2.6.x (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-calendar-maintainers
Evolution QA team
: 337406 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks: 317266
 
 
Reported: 2006-01-14 14:41 UTC by Ludovic Danigo
Modified: 2013-09-13 00:51 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.13/2.14


Description Ludovic Danigo 2006-01-14 14:41:14 UTC 
Please describe the problem:
When you try to update a recurring appointment it and apply the changes to all
instances make them all disappear except the one your editing in the calendar
view. Try to re-edit it and it still ask if you want to apply changes to all
instance, so I guess it is only a display bug.

Steps to reproduce:
1. Create a recurring appointment (all every day every two weeks)
2. Save it
3. Open an instance
4. Add an alarm for the day before
5. Save by responding apply to all instance


Actual results:
N - 1 instance disapear in the calendar view

Expected results:
not disapearing ? ;)

Does this happen every time?
yes

Other information:
Comment 1 André Klapper 2006-01-17 10:23:54 UTC 
i cannot reproduce this running evo2.5.4, cvs checkout three days ago. which 2.5.x exactly are you running?
Comment 2 Ludovic Danigo 2006-01-21 08:59:54 UTC 
Ok, I think I took my Dapper evolution for the garnome one while testing a bit garnome and it seems that the ubuntu evolution is quite patched. Closing it as it shouldn't have been open up here in the first place. Really sorry for the time lost on it :(
Comment 3 André Klapper 2006-04-05 20:28:55 UTC 
*** Bug 337406 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***