After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 326064 - Artifacts on some widgets
Artifacts on some widgets
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gtk+
Classification: Platform
Component: Widget: Other
2.8.x
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: gtk-bugs
gtk-bugs
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-01-07 05:53 UTC by Andrew Conkling
Modified: 2006-10-27 13:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
A screenshot showing the affected widgets (987.04 KB, image/png)
2006-01-07 05:54 UTC, Andrew Conkling
Details

Description Andrew Conkling 2006-01-07 05:53:04 UTC
Please describe the problem:
Since upgrading to 2.8, I've noticed some artifacts on two widgets: a
GtkExpander and a GtkCalendar.  The expander's arrow can get misaligned and the
calendar doesn't turn inactive when it loses focus.

Steps to reproduce:
For the Expander:
1. Change the displayed label from one line to two, or vice versa.
2. Notice that the expander arrow is misaligned.
3. Mouse over the expander or its label to correct.

For the Calendar:
1. Select the calendar to make it active (it turns the active color).
2. Select another window to make it inactive.  Notice that it doesn't change
color immediately.
3. Pass another window over the calendar (while it is inactive) to see it turn
inactive.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Does this happen every time?


Other information:
Comment 1 Andrew Conkling 2006-01-07 05:54:58 UTC
Created attachment 56907 [details]
A screenshot showing the affected widgets
Comment 2 Matthias Clasen 2006-01-11 03:49:35 UTC
2006-01-10  Matthias Clasen  <mclasen@redhat.com>

	* gtk/gtkcalendar.c (gtk_calendar_focus_out): Queue a draw
	when losing the focus.  (#326064, Andrew Conkling)
Comment 3 Matthias Clasen 2006-01-11 04:17:12 UTC
I thought I had seen the expander problem you describe, but I can't reproduce it now.
Comment 4 Andrew Conkling 2006-01-11 04:23:24 UTC
Is there anything I can do to help narrow it down?
Comment 5 Andrew Conkling 2006-10-27 13:47:39 UTC
I've not noticed this in a while; closing.