After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 322313 - Spell Checker in forms for epiphany
Spell Checker in forms for epiphany
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 121711
Product: epiphany-extensions
Classification: Deprecated
Component: general
1.9.x
Other Linux
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: epiphany-extensions-maint
epiphany-extensions-maint
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-11-24 11:11 UTC by Daniel Holbach
Modified: 2006-06-28 13:29 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Daniel Holbach 2005-11-24 11:11:59 UTC 
Version details: 1.9.2
Distribution/Version: Ubuntu Dapper

Forwarded from: http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=18692

How useful would this be! It would be great, I make so many typos using my
webmail and on forums. It could use libaspell like gaim, evolution and others
use. It could be written as an extension I guess, you would be able to to select
whether or not to check the spelling of a perticular text box in the future. 

I think this would be a great adition - w00ps - typo :)
Comment 1 Adam Hooper 2005-11-24 11:52:27 UTC 
Anybody interested in implementing this should look at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16409 and
http://spellbound.sourceforge.net/
Comment 2 Corey Burger 2005-12-16 06:58:52 UTC 
What about using libsexy ala xchat-gnome?
Comment 3 Corey Burger 2005-12-16 07:12:32 UTC 
Is this not a duplicate of 
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121711 ?
Comment 4 Christian Persch 2005-12-16 11:10:07 UTC 
Sort of, yes. Although this bug is about making an extension of it, while the
other is about doing this in epiphany itself...
Comment 5 Jon Bolt 2006-03-16 14:25:35 UTC 
Has any development started on this extension?
Comment 6 Christian Persch 2006-03-16 16:01:40 UTC 
No.
Comment 7 Christian Persch 2006-03-16 17:43:01 UTC 
Anyone implementing this should look at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151040 .
Comment 8 Christian Persch 2006-03-16 17:43:53 UTC 
Err I mean https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302050 .
Comment 9 Reinout van Schouwen 2006-04-06 12:37:44 UTC 
I vote for doing this in Epiphany itself and marking this one a dupe. Anyone disagree?
Comment 10 Christian Persch 2006-06-28 13:29:17 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 121711 ***