After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 319726 - Setting Recursive permissions on files/folders
Setting Recursive permissions on files/folders
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 44767
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: File Properties Dialog
2.10.x
Other Linux
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-10-25 12:14 UTC by Graham Innes
Modified: 2005-11-13 17:36 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.9/2.10



Description Graham Innes 2005-10-25 12:14:25 UTC
Distribution/Version: Gentoo

Changing permissions recursively for an entire directory tree containing is
currently not a simple task in nautilus. It is possible to set permissions for
multiple files at once, but it is not possible to set permissions recursively to
files and folders below the current folder. 

This problem is frequently experienced by users copying data from read-only
media (CDs, DVDs etc.) to read/write media (hard disk):

Example:
Fred receives a CD full of documents all organized into multiple levels of
sub-folders, which he copies to a folder in his home folder. He needs write
access to all files, but currently only has read access. So he has to go into
each sub-folder individually, select all files in that folder, then set
permissions correctly. A time-consuming task if there are many sub-folders.

On the command line, a simple "chmod -R u+w foldername" does the trick, but most
GUI users don't know that (and IMO shouldn't need to).

Possible Solution:
Add a new checkbox to the permissions tab of the folder properties dialog.
Something like:
"Apply permissions recursively" (too much jargon?)
or "Apply to all files and folders within this folder" (too long?)

There are probably better ways of putting that...

GDI
Comment 1 Sebastien Bacher 2005-11-13 17:36:31 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into
our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 44767 ***