After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 316320 - additional address books are all act as the same address book
additional address books are all act as the same address book
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 316072
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Contacts
2.4.x (obsolete)
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-addressbook-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-09-14 16:42 UTC by Michael Quinn
Modified: 2005-09-16 09:31 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.11/2.12


Description Michael Quinn 2005-09-14 16:42:49 UTC 
Distribution/Version: Ubuntu Breezy

Repro Steps:
1.  Create two additional contact lists (so you will have "Personal" and then
two more)
2.  Add a contact to one of the two new lists
3.  Browse to the other of the two new lists

Results:
The contact is displayed in both new lists

Expected:
It should only appear in the list you added it to

Other notes:
If you delete one of the new lists, then try to delete the other, you are told
that the list can not be deleted.
Comment 1 André Klapper 2005-09-15 09:11:28 UTC 
contact lists are lists of contacts. you can create them by using "new | contact
list". what you are talking about is called "address book". :-)
Comment 2 Sushma Rai 2005-09-16 06:45:14 UTC 
Adding contact to one address book will not add the same contact to all other 
local address book.

your problem looks similar to 
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316072, 
Non English Evolution on Ubuntu Breezy.

Can you look at your address book GCONF keys
for all your address books and see the values?
Comment 3 Michael Quinn 2005-09-16 07:12:00 UTC 
Ahh, yes, that is it.  The URI was not filled in.  The given workaround worked
for me.

Sorry for the duplicate
Comment 4 Sushma Rai 2005-09-16 09:31:46 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 316072 ***