After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 315136 - gnome-vfs-2.11.92 compile error against new samba 3.0.20
gnome-vfs-2.11.92 compile error against new samba 3.0.20
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 315001
Product: gnome-vfs
Classification: Deprecated
Component: Module: smb
2.11.x
Other Linux
: Normal critical
: ---
Assigned To: gnome-vfs maintainers
gnome-vfs maintainers
: 315402 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-09-02 16:44 UTC by kyler
Modified: 2005-09-07 09:27 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.11/2.12

Attachments
Proposed fix (1.86 KB, patch)
2005-09-02 19:31 UTC, Daniel Gryniewicz 		none Details | Review

Description kyler 2005-09-02 16:44:21 UTC 
Version details: 2.11.92
Distribution/Version: LFS

Compile and install samba 3.0.20, then attempt to compile gnome-vfs 2.11.92 with
samba support, and it should die.  Looks like one of the internal samba
functions was modified... perhaps a samba issue, but I figured I would start here.

smb-method.c: In function `do_close':
smb-method.c:1489: error: structure has no member named `close'
make[2]: *** [smb-method.lo] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/usr/local/relykOS/source/gnomevfs/gnome-vfs-2.11.92/modules'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/relykOS/source/gnomevfs/gnome-vfs-2.11.92'
make: *** [all] Error 2
Comment 1 Daniel Gryniewicz 2005-09-02 19:19:51 UTC 
We have this this too in gentoo.  I'm attaching the patch we're using to fix
this.  This is also a problem with previous gnome-vfs versions (including 2.10.1).
Comment 2 Daniel Gryniewicz 2005-09-02 19:31:18 UTC 
Created attachment 51737 [details] [review]
Proposed fix

Here is our proposed fix for 2.11.92.  A similar fix (applies with fuzz) is
necessary for 2.10.1
Comment 3 Edward Hervey 2005-09-03 10:53:28 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 315001 ***
Comment 4 Christian Neumair 2005-09-07 09:27:07 UTC 
*** Bug 315402 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***