After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 312413 - new attachment ui duplicates ui/functionality and hence confusing
new attachment ui duplicates ui/functionality and hence confusing
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
2.4.x (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal normal
: Future
Assigned To: Srinivasa Ragavan
Evolution QA team
composer
: 318301 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-08-02 21:20 UTC by Jeffrey Stedfast
Modified: 2008-03-31 20:15 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.11/2.12



Description Jeffrey Stedfast 2005-08-02 21:20:32 UTC
don't duplicate ui, it confuses the user

Other information:
message attachments appear both in the free-flowing message body AND in the
attachment bar - this is a huge waste of space and also confusing to the user.
Comment 1 Jeffrey Stedfast 2005-08-02 21:26:52 UTC
Nat's big UI push for CODE10 was to remove duplicate UI/functionaility in
GNOME/Evolution as study after study has shown that this only results in
confusing users. we are taking a HUGE step backwards in this regard with this
new attachment UI.
Comment 2 Srinivasa Ragavan 2005-08-03 05:44:57 UTC
Jeff, 
we arent literally duplicating the UI. One is the bar where you access
attachments similiar to file icons and other is the inline view the same. Though
u can save/ dnd from either place. I guess the same idea evolved from the
discussion on e-h list with nat/dobey and others.
Comment 3 Srinivasa Ragavan 2005-08-05 05:57:47 UTC
We should sure look at it in more better way. Im moving to future.
Comment 4 André Klapper 2005-10-08 22:36:02 UTC
*** Bug 318301 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Antoine Pitrou 2005-10-08 23:43:00 UTC
Hi,

as mentioned in #318301, the problem with the attachment "bar" beneath the
headers is that most of the time it is triggered by "false" attachments. For
example I am subscribed to some mailing-lists where nearly every message has its
footer attached instead of appended to the body (probably because the ML engine
does not like managing different charsets).
So it's very annoying to have this attachment bar prominently displayed in those
cases.
Comment 6 Srinivasa Ragavan 2005-10-11 02:40:58 UTC
Antoine, ill look into it. But as andre said by specs those are attachments.
Comment 7 Antoine Pitrou 2005-10-11 13:09:26 UTC
By the way, here is the source for such a message. It could be simple to detect
message parts which have a Content-Type of "text/*" and a Content-Disposition of
"inline", and decide that they are not to be considered as true attachments.
After all "inline" means just that, exactly like the difference between <img
src="..."> and <a href="..."> in HTML.


(message follows, most content and private e-mail addresses removed)


Return-Path: <copyleft_attitude-owner@april.org>
X-Original-To: XXX
Delivered-To: XXX
Received: from ns1.april.org (ns1.april.org [212.180.1.10]) by
        brinstar.nerim.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 445C6B1 for
        <XXX>; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 14:38:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sympa by ns1.april.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id
        1EPJN4-0004gw-00; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 14:36:43 +0200
Received: from mail by ns1.april.org with spam-scanned (Exim 3.36 #1
        (Debian)) id 1EPJMp-0005M6-00 for <copyleft_attitude@april.org>; Tue, 11
        Oct 2005 14:36:35 +0200
Received: from mx-out.tiscali.fr ([213.36.80.91] helo=mail.libertysurf.net)
        by ns1.april.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EPJMo-000660-00 for
        <copyleft_attitude@april.org>; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 14:36:26 +0200
Received: from clansco.clansco.org (213.36.25.39) by mail.libertysurf.net
        (7.1.026) id 432E7C7D00478FE9 for copyleft_attitude@april.org; Tue, 11 Oct
        2005 14:36:43 +0200
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 14:38:31 +0200
From: clansco <XXX>
To: copyleft_attitude@april.org
Message-Id: <20051011143831.68fdbfe7.falsetti@clansco.org>
In-Reply-To: <4348D1FF.2030102@artlibre.org>
References: <4344C269.70507@artlibre.org>
         <20051008222757.4fb83528.falsetti@clansco.org>
         <4348D1FF.2030102@artlibre.org>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.2 (GTK+ 2.6.1; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on ns1.april.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO 
        autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3
Reply-To: copyleft_attitude@april.org
X-Loop: copyleft_attitude@april.org
X-Sequence: 1769
Errors-to: copyleft_attitude-owner@april.org
Precedence: list
X-no-archive: yes
List-Id: <copyleft_attitude.april.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa@april.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:
        <mailto:sympa@april.org?subject=subscribe%20copyleft_attitude>
List-Unsubscribe:
        <mailto:sympa@april.org?subject=unsubscribe%20copyleft_attitude>
List-Post: <mailto:copyleft_attitude@april.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:copyleft_attitude-request@april.org>
List-Archive: <http://www.april.org/wws/arc/copyleft_attitude>
Subject: [copyleft_attitude] Re: nouveau site artlibre.org
Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1129034198-5447-18"
X-Evolution-Source: XXX

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

------------=_1129034198-5447-18
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Bonjour antoine moreau,
et merci pour ta r=E9ponse.

[...]

------------=_1129034198-5447-18
Content-Type: text/plain; name="message-footer.txt"
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="message-footer.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


--
Pour toute commande au robot de la liste, adressez vous a sympa@april.org
Copyleft Attitude : <http://artlibre.org>
Archives et administration : <http://www.april.org/wws/>

------------=_1129034198-5447-18--
Comment 8 Matthew Barnes 2008-03-11 00:25:12 UTC
Bumping version to a stable release.
Comment 9 Matthew Barnes 2008-03-29 14:39:37 UTC
Is this bug still valid?
Comment 10 Jeffrey Stedfast 2008-03-29 15:03:43 UTC
this can be closed as far as I'm concerned
Comment 11 Matthew Barnes 2008-03-29 16:35:44 UTC
Cool, thanks Jeff.  Closing as OBSOLETE.
Comment 12 Antoine Pitrou 2008-03-31 20:15:35 UTC
Hi,

It's probably not the same bug as described in the report, but my remarks in comments #5 and #7 are still valid (for Evolution 2.12 though - I'm waiting for the Mandriva packages to stabilize before I upgrade). Should I open another entry for that?