After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 307001 - GConf could use mmap to load it's XML files
GConf could use mmap to load it's XML files
Status: RESOLVED NOTABUG
Product: GConf
Classification: Deprecated
Component: XML backend
CVS HEAD
Other All
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: GConf Maintainers
GConf Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-06-09 09:31 UTC by Philip Van Hoof
Modified: 2005-12-23 13:17 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: Unversioned Enhancement


Attachments
A simple testcase (2.68 KB, patch)
2005-06-09 09:32 UTC, Philip Van Hoof
none Details | Review
A simple testcase (2.68 KB, patch)
2005-06-09 09:33 UTC, Philip Van Hoof
none Details | Review
Same but now for markup-tree.c (2.32 KB, patch)
2005-06-09 10:49 UTC, Philip Van Hoof
none Details | Review
And this one also really works :-) (2.64 KB, patch)
2005-06-09 11:21 UTC, Philip Van Hoof
none Details | Review

Description Philip Van Hoof 2005-06-09 09:31:44 UTC
Will attach a patch that illustratres and can be used to do performance tests
Comment 1 Philip Van Hoof 2005-06-09 09:32:32 UTC
Created attachment 47497 [details] [review]
A simple testcase

This isn't a patch that should go in HEAD. It's a testcase to do performance
testing.
Comment 2 Philip Van Hoof 2005-06-09 09:33:49 UTC
Created attachment 47498 [details] [review]
A simple testcase

This isn't a patch that should go in HEAD. It's a testcase to do performance
testing.
Comment 3 Philip Van Hoof 2005-06-09 10:02:12 UTC
Oh. I just learned that this file isn't use anymore. Bummer :-). It's in the
markup-* files, right? 
Comment 4 Philip Van Hoof 2005-06-09 10:49:47 UTC
Created attachment 47501 [details] [review]
Same but now for markup-tree.c
Comment 5 Philip Van Hoof 2005-06-09 11:21:33 UTC
Created attachment 47503 [details] [review]
And this one also really works :-)
Comment 6 Philip Van Hoof 2005-06-09 13:28:42 UTC
Also look at Bug #148218
Comment 7 Philip Van Hoof 2005-06-09 17:13:19 UTC
There's some comments about this at Bug #306801