After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 306225 - Use Ctrl+= also for Zoom In
Use Ctrl+= also for Zoom In
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: Keyboardability
2.11.x
Other All
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-06-02 07:09 UTC by Jaap A. Haitsma
Modified: 2005-06-02 19:03 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.9/2.10


Attachments
Proposed patch (against HEAD). (1.58 KB, patch)
2005-06-02 14:32 UTC, Christian Neumair
committed Details | Review

Description Jaap A. Haitsma 2005-06-02 07:09:23 UTC
On a laptop the + is accessed by pressing Shift and "=". So it would be handy to
also add Ctrl+= as shortcut key. Then you do not have to hold the shift which
makes the shortcut quite awkward. Firefox a.o. uses this trick.
Comment 1 Christian Neumair 2005-06-02 09:47:21 UTC
Thanks for your bug report!
I'm really not sure whether binding an action that involves an equal sign to
zoom-in increases usability. Usability crew, any comments? Should ctrl+= be
bound to zoom-in?
Comment 2 Alan Horkan 2005-06-02 11:58:48 UTC
I fought long and hard to have the HIG (version 2.0) specify *both*
Before that the HIG actually said to use Ctrl =  which was terrible for many
European users

The problem is that on American (and other) keyboard layouts Ctrl + actually
requires Ctrl  Shift +  where as on many European keyboard layouts the Equals
key is actually quite difficult to get at.  
there is a mental leap happening, users are simply hitting the key with the +
sign on it and not think about it very much

The best solution is to label the menu item Zoom In  Ctrl++ and provide both +
and also  = if possible but if for whatever reason it is impractical to provide
both keybindings then go with Ctrl++ as it is the least worst answer for the
widest possible audience.  

It (having two keybindings for the same thing) is messy but I sincerely believe
it is worth doing, and when it is done right no one will even notice it was ever
an issue.  
Comment 3 Christian Neumair 2005-06-02 14:31:21 UTC
Thanks for your explanations Alan.
Comment 4 Christian Neumair 2005-06-02 14:32:03 UTC
Created attachment 47143 [details] [review]
Proposed patch (against HEAD).
Comment 5 Christian Neumair 2005-06-02 19:03:57 UTC
Thanks for your efforts. The issue will be fixed in the upcoming 2.11 release.