After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 300034 - "Mark as read" missing in RMB context menu
"Mark as read" missing in RMB context menu
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 273192
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
2.2.x (obsolete)
Other other
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-04-09 22:56 UTC by Shawn K. Quinn
Modified: 2005-04-10 04:06 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.7/2.8


Description Shawn K. Quinn 2005-04-09 22:56:35 UTC 
Distribution: Debian 3.1
Package: Evolution
Priority: Minor
Version: GNOME2.8.3 2.2.1
Gnome-Distributor: Debian
Synopsis: "Mark as read" missing in RMB context menu
Bugzilla-Product: Evolution
Bugzilla-Component: Mailer
Bugzilla-Version: 2.2.1
Description:
The "mark as read" item that was in 2.0.x and earlier is missing in
2.2.1.1. I can't think of a good reason why this would be taken out.




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2005-04-09 18:56 -------


Unknown platform unknown. Setting to default platform "Other".
Unknown milestone "unknown" in product "Evolution".
   Setting to default milestone for this product, '---'
The original reporter of this bug does not have
   an account here. Reassigning to the person who moved
   it here, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org.
   Previous reporter was skquinn@speakeasy.net.
Setting to default status "UNCONFIRMED".
Setting qa contact to the default for this product.
   This bug either had no qa contact or an invalid one.
Comment 1 Elijah Newren 2005-04-10 04:06:12 UTC 
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into
our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 273192 ***