After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 265880 - Crash: Proceso 26674
Crash: Proceso 26674
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 242867
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
unspecified
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Evolution Triage Team
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2004-09-13 18:40 UTC by Rodrigo Flores
Modified: 2004-09-14 00:20 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Rodrigo Flores 2004-09-13 18:40:01 UTC
Distribution: SuSE Linux 9.1 (i586)
Package: Evolution
Priority: Normal
Version: GNOME2.4.1 unspecified
Gnome-Distributor: GNOME.Org
Synopsis: Proceso 26674
Bugzilla-Product: Evolution
Bugzilla-Component: Mailer
Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.4.0.1)
Description:
Description of the crash:
al estar verificando los mails.

Steps to reproduce the crash:
1. 
2. 
3. 

Expected Results:


How often does this happen?


Additional Information:



Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/opt/gnome/bin/evolution-1.4'

(no debugging symbols found)...Using host libthread_db library
"/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging
symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...[Thread debugging using
libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 1094660736 (LWP 26674)]
[New Thread 1126886320 (LWP 2613)]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 1094660736 (LWP 26674)]
[New Thread 1126886320 (LWP 2613)]
[New Thread 1122163632 (LWP 28121)]
[New Thread 1119894448 (LWP 26716)]
[New Thread 1117793200 (LWP 26715)]
[New Thread 1115691952 (LWP 26714)]
[New Thread 1113590704 (LWP 26713)]
[New Thread 1110113200 (LWP 26691)]
[New Thread 1107663792 (LWP 26690)]
[New Thread 1105562544 (LWP 26689)]
(no debugging symbols found)...[Thread debugging using libthread_db
enabled]
[New Thread 1094660736 (LWP 26674)]
[New Thread 1126886320 (LWP 2613)]
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging
symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...0xffffe410 in ?? ()
  • #0 ??
  • #1 ??
  • #2 ??
  • #3 ??
  • #4 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
  • #5 libgnomeui_segv_handle
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #6 segv_redirect
  • #7 <signal handler called>
  • #8 gtk_widget_get_accessible
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #9 html_utils_get_accessible
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtkhtml-3.0.so.4
  • #10 gtk_html_a11y_ref_child
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtkhtml-3.0.so.4
  • #11 atk_object_ref_accessible_child
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0
  • #12 spi_atk_bridge_signal_listener
    from /opt/gnome/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libatk-bridge.so
  • #13 signal_emit_unlocked_R
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #14 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #15 g_signal_emit_by_name
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #16 gail_container_real_remove_gtk
    from /opt/gnome/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgail.so
  • #17 gail_container_remove_gtk
    from /opt/gnome/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgail.so
  • #18 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #19 g_closure_invoke
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #20 signal_emit_unlocked_R
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #21 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #22 g_signal_emit
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #23 gtk_container_remove
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #24 destroy
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtkhtml-3.0.so.4
  • #25 destroy
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtkhtml-3.0.so.4
  • #26 html_object_destroy
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtkhtml-3.0.so.4
  • #27 destroy
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtkhtml-3.0.so.4
  • #28 destroy
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtkhtml-3.0.so.4
  • #29 ??
  • #30 ??
  • #31 g_malloc
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0



Unknown reporter: rodrigo.flores@icisa.com.mx, changed to bugbuddy-import@ximian.com.
Setting qa contact to the default for this product.
   This bug either had no qa contact or an invalid one.

Comment 1 Gerardo Marin 2004-09-14 00:20:03 UTC
Actualiza tu Evolution

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 242867 ***