Bug 255534 – Crash: not sure if this is a11y or evo's fault

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 255534 - Crash: not sure if this is a11y or evo's fault


Summary:	Crash: not sure if this is a11y or evo's fault


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 252935

Product:	evolution
Classification:	Applications
Component:	Calendar
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	Normal blocker
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Evolution Triage Team
QA Contact:	Evolution QA team

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2004-03-12 23:25 UTC by Luis Villa
Modified:	2004-03-14 00:45 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	---

Description Luis Villa 2004-03-12 23:25:37 UTC

Distribution: Fedora Core release 1 (Yarrow)
Package: Evolution
Priority: Blocker
Version: GNOME2.5.91 unspecified
Gnome-Distributor: GNOME.Org
Synopsis: not sure if this is a11y or evo's fault
Bugzilla-Product: Evolution
Bugzilla-Component: Calendar
Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.5.91)
Description:
Description of the crash:
I'm playing with some things with a11y on, and evo crashed while I was
doing that. I think I was just moving 'up' one entry in the main mail
listing.


Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/home/louie/jhbuilt/bin/evolution-1.5'

Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1".
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1084788608 (LWP 31289)]
[New Thread 158571440 (LWP 2108)]
[New Thread 148081584 (LWP 2089)]
[New Thread 106347440 (LWP 14015)]
[New Thread 58657712 (LWP 31642)]
[New Thread 95857584 (LWP 31625)]
[New Thread 70069168 (LWP 31616)]
[New Thread 48167856 (LWP 31615)]
0x002b6c32 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2

+ Trace 45069

Thread 1 (Thread -1084788608 (LWP 31289))

#0 _dl_sysinfo_int80
from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
#2 libgnomeui_segv_handle
at gnome-ui-init.c line 741
#3 segv_redirect
at main.c line 445
#4 <signal handler called>
#5 eti_ref_at
at gal-a11y-e-table-item.c line 317
#6 atk_table_ref_at
at atktable.c line 157
#7 eti_a11y_cursor_changed_cb
at gal-a11y-e-table-item.c line 1189
#8 e_marshal_VOID__INT_INT
at e-marshal.c line 812
#9 g_closure_invoke
at gclosure.c line 437
#10 signal_emit_unlocked_R
at gsignal.c line 2436
#11 g_signal_emit_valist
at gsignal.c line 2195
#12 g_signal_emit
at gsignal.c line 2239
#13 e_selection_model_cursor_changed
at e-selection-model.c line 660
#14 restore_cursor
at e-tree-selection-model.c line 144
#15 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__POINTER
at gmarshal.c line 601
#16 g_closure_invoke
at gclosure.c line 437
#17 signal_emit_unlocked_R
at gsignal.c line 2506
#18 g_signal_emit_valist
at gsignal.c line 2195
#19 g_signal_emit
at gsignal.c line 2239
#20 e_tree_model_node_changed
at e-tree-model.c line 259
#21 e_tree_memory_thaw
at e-tree-memory.c line 205
#22 build_flat
at message-list.c line 2296
#23 regen_list_regened
at message-list.c line 3304
#24 mail_msgport_replied
at mail-mt.c line 397
#25 g_io_unix_dispatch
at giounix.c line 161
#26 g_main_dispatch
at gmain.c line 1887
#27 g_main_context_dispatch
at gmain.c line 2433
#28 g_main_context_iterate
at gmain.c line 2514
#29 g_main_loop_run
at gmain.c line 2718
#30 bonobo_main
at bonobo-main.c line 297
#31 main
at main.c line 589
#0 _dl_sysinfo_int80
from /lib/ld-linux.so.2




Setting qa contact to the default for this product.
   This bug either had no qa contact or an invalid one.

Comment 1 Gerardo Marin 2004-03-14 00:45:48 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 252935 ***