After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 249448 - Should evolution close eds and alarm-notify on exit?
Should evolution close eds and alarm-notify on exit?
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 225828
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: general
2.4.x (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal minor
: ---
Assigned To: Harish Krishnaswamy
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2003-10-08 10:24 UTC by Russel Winder
Modified: 2013-09-13 00:48 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Russel Winder 2003-10-08 10:24:03 UTC
When closing evolution the evolution-wombat and evolution-alarm-notify
processes are left running unless an explicit "evolution --force-shutdown"
is executed.  This means that the calendar and contacts files are still in
use between evolution sessions.  This is not a problem if the same machine
is used all the time but if multiple machines are used and especially if
the machines have separate filestores which are kept in synchronization it
seems that data updates can be lost.

For example if I use machine agwisance at work then copy my contact and
calendar information to elon at home then make changes to the databases at
home then copy them back to work I find that unless I manually ensure
evolution-wombat is closed at both sites before making any of the copies in
either direction there seems to be loss of updated data in both calendar
and contacts.

I think it would be good to have an option in evolution setup to say always
kill all spawned processes on shutdown so as to cover failing to manually
issue the necessary command after closing evolution -- or is this me just
being too wimpish?
Comment 1 André Klapper 2005-07-16 16:58:29 UTC
still valid in 2.3.5.1, reassigning to harish.

it's called "evolution-alarm-notify" and "evolution-data-server" nowadays,
chanigng subject to reflect this.

...why does
         ps ax | grep evo
tell me that the process is called "evolution-data-server-1.4", by the way? i'm
running eds-1.3.5 here!
harish?!
Comment 2 André Klapper 2005-07-16 17:05:33 UTC
perhaps related/the same as bug 253904?
does this also depend on bug 219197?
Comment 3 Not Zed 2005-08-25 06:07:51 UTC
the name is the name of the program, not the version of it ..

Anyway, i would say to the title, "no, it shouldn't", the whole point of it is
it can notify you without having evolution running.

If you are doing out-of-band synchronisation, then you have to shutdown eds
anyway; not a 'supported' operation anyway, and not a bug.

Comment 4 Luis Villa 2006-02-06 16:49:03 UTC
One half of this bug is a dup of bug 253904; the other half a dup of bug 225828. Picking one of the two at random.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 225828 ***