After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 227744 - Mark as read on a collapsed thread doesn't work properly
Mark as read on a collapsed thread doesn't work properly
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 262328
Product: GAL
Classification: Deprecated
Component: ETree
unspecified
Other All
: Normal minor
: ---
Assigned To: Evolution Product Design Team
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-07-13 11:43 UTC by Mattias Karlsson
Modified: 2005-07-15 15:53 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Mattias Karlsson 2002-07-13 11:43:49 UTC
Choosing "mark as read" on a collapsed thread only affects the first
message in that thread.


Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. Collapse a thread of unread messages.
2. Select the thread and chose "mark as read"

Actual Results:
Only the top message in the thread is marked as read.

Expected Results:
All messages in the thread should be marked as read.

How often does this happen? 
Every time
Comment 1 Jeffrey Stedfast 2002-07-13 19:02:00 UTC
well, this is the way I would personally expect it to work
Comment 2 Mattias Karlsson 2002-07-13 21:21:59 UTC
I always thought selecting a collapsed thread would select every
message in the thread. I usually select a number of threads that I
don't find interesting and mark as read. I found it odd that the
messages were still unread after doing that. 

Actually, when just selecting a single collapsed thread, I can see
your point (just a matter of what you expect I guess), but when
selecting a number of threads and messages (with shift), usually every
thing every thing gets selected and this would include all messages in
the thread as well or?
Comment 3 Mattias Karlsson 2002-07-13 21:29:44 UTC
When I think about it, you're probably right. When selecting a single
collapsed thread it should probably behave as it's doing right now. I
still think it's not working right when shift-selecting a number of
threads though.
Comment 4 Not Zed 2002-09-18 05:32:56 UTC
moving this to gal, as etable is responsible for all selection handling.

perhaps shift-click could select the whole tree, even if hidden.

or perhaps nothing should change.
Comment 5 Jeffrey Stedfast 2004-05-04 16:19:47 UTC
product design team needs to make the choice here before anyone can
implement anything... not that this is high on any todo list since no
one is maintaining gal, but ah well.
Comment 6 Nicolas da Luz Duque 2005-04-18 16:35:56 UTC
I have the same bug here on version 2.2.1.1 but I don't have to collapse the thread.

I select the first message of a thread. It becomes read. I type Ctrl+h to select
the whole thread, then Ctrl+k to mark as read. 
Nothing changes, and only the first message is marked as read.

If I type Ctrl+Shift+k to mark the whole thread as unread, and then Ctrl+k to
mark as read, all the messages in the thread are correctly marked as read.
Comment 7 André Klapper 2005-07-15 15:53:05 UTC
nicolas, comment #6: cannot reproduce that.

this is a duplicate of bug 262328.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 262328 ***