After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 218621 - RFE: POP delete message when deleted locally
RFE: POP delete message when deleted locally
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 201824
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
unspecified
Other All
: Normal enhancement
: Future
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
: 218795 218887 219268 219830 220019 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-01-14 13:10 UTC by henrik.magnusson
Modified: 2002-02-05 22:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: Unversioned Enhancement


Description henrik.magnusson 2002-01-14 13:14:51 UTC 
Package: Evolution
Priority: Normal
Version: 1.0.1
Synopsis: Message not removed from POP3-server
Bugzilla-Product: Evolution
Bugzilla-Component: Mailer

Description:
I've set the the option to leave mail on server. But there is no option
to delete a message from the server later on. In Outlook, there is a
possibility to delete messages on server, when deleted locally.

Expunge and Empty trash doesn't do anything on the server. The POP3
server is an exchange 5.5.
Comment 1 israel 2002-01-18 23:44:29 UTC 
*** bug 218887 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 israel 2002-01-18 23:45:26 UTC 
*** bug 218795 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 israel 2002-01-31 00:43:55 UTC 
*** bug 219268 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Jeffrey Stedfast 2002-01-31 18:34:50 UTC 
I think it was decided that we would not implement this "if you want
IMAP functionality then use IMAP" but we may have changed our minds, I
don't rcall. Anyways, this will be extremely hard to do.

also, there are several dups of this floating around bugzilla.
Comment 5 israel 2002-02-01 19:47:35 UTC 
*** bug 219830 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Jeffrey Stedfast 2002-02-03 21:57:17 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 201824 ***
Comment 7 israel 2002-02-05 22:47:40 UTC 
*** bug 220019 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***