After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 206934 - crash while removing child node from collapsed parent node
crash while removing child node from collapsed parent node
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 216974
Product: GAL
Classification: Deprecated
Component: ETree
unspecified
Other All
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Mike Kestner
Mike Kestner
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2001-08-09 23:48 UTC by Kevin Vandersloot
Modified: 2002-09-03 19:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: Unversioned Enhancement


Description Kevin Vandersloot 2001-08-09 23:48:02 UTC 
This does not happen regularly for me, but what usually happens is this. In
procman if I have a chain of process dependencies (for instance when
compiling some app) and I collapse the parent node, I can trigger this
crash. It happens when a child node is removed from the tree.

This could be related to bug#206795 as both crashes are in
e_tree_model_node_get_next.

here is the back-trace

+ Trace 8284

  • #4 pthread_sighandler
    at signals.c line 97
  • #5 <signal handler called>
  • #6 etmm_get_next
    at e-tree-memory.c line 231
  • #7 e_tree_model_node_get_next
    at e-tree-model.c line 391
  • #8 generate_children
    at e-tree-sorted.c line 426
  • #9 ets_is_expandable
    at e-tree-sorted.c line 759
  • #10 e_tree_model_node_is_expandable
    at e-tree-model.c line 452
  • #11 offset_of_node
    at e-cell-tree.c line 88
  • #12 ect_draw
    at e-cell-tree.c line 201
  • #13 e_cell_draw
    at e-cell.c line 238
  • #14 eti_draw
    at e-table-item.c line 1433
  • #15 gnome_canvas_group_draw
    at gnome-canvas.c line 1864
  • #16 paint
    at gnome-canvas.c line 3306
  • #17 do_update
    at gnome-canvas.c line 3368
  • #4 pthread_sighandler
    at signals.c line 97
  • #5 <signal handler called>
  • #6 etmm_get_next
    at e-tree-memory.c line 231
  • #7 e_tree_model_node_get_next
    at e-tree-model.c line 391 






Comment 1


Luis Villa





          2001-08-16 16:29:20 UTC
        



clahey: are this and 4698 related? 






Comment 2


Chris Lahey





          2001-08-17 00:29:03 UTC
        



This bug is not related directly to either of the other bugs mentioned.






Comment 3


Luis Villa





          2001-08-22 21:07:18 UTC
        



*** bug 207438 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 4


Gerardo Marin





          2002-09-03 19:47:03 UTC
        




*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 216974 ***