After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 206605 - Importing Outlook express 4 mailbox (mbx)
Importing Outlook express 4 mailbox (mbx)
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 204186
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Importers
pre-1.5 (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal blocker
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
: 214697 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2001-08-07 08:46 UTC by fausto.saporito
Modified: 2001-12-12 19:56 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description fausto.saporito 2001-08-07 08:49:31 UTC 
Package: Evolution
Priority: Blocker
Version: 0.12.99
Synopsis: Importing Outlook express 4 mailbox
Bugzilla-Product: Evolution
Bugzilla-Component: Importers

Description:
Hello,

I have an .mbx file (from Outlook Express 4) and I'd like to import it in my evolution, but when I try to make it I have neither errors neither messages in my mail box.

Any idea?

regards and thanks in advance,
Fausto Saporito



Unknown reporter: fausto.saporito@tlc.semagroup.it, changed to bugbuddy-import@ximian.com.
Comment 1 Manuel Borchers 2001-10-25 16:19:43 UTC 
Should be fixed, because 0.12.99 is a bit outdated...
Marking the bug as fixed.

Manuel
Comment 2 Luis Villa 2001-10-25 16:53:20 UTC 
Not so much fixed, but... still a duplicate.
Comment 3 marten ter borgh 2001-11-25 01:02:53 UTC 
Confirmed for 0.99.2. I get a vague error and than the mail component
goes unresponsive.
I can't find any older duplicate bugs - removing keyword probabledup,
marking 14697 as a dup of this bug.
I came accross bug 204186 - that one is about implementing this feature.
Was this implemented and then broken or was it never implemented and
just added to the importer dialog?
If the latter is true, please make this bug depend on 4186, else
please close bug 204186.
Thanks!
Comment 4 marten ter borgh 2001-11-25 01:03:18 UTC 
*** bug 214697 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Luis Villa 2001-12-12 19:56:00 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 204186 ***