After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 206104 - vFolder sources UI should be nicer
vFolder sources UI should be nicer
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
2.2.x (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal normal
: Future
Assigned To: Evolution Product Design Team
Evolution QA team
evolution[vfolders]
Depends on:
Blocks: 216096
 
 
Reported: 2001-08-02 19:12 UTC by Kevin Breit
Modified: 2013-09-13 00:49 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Kevin Breit 2001-08-02 19:10:19 UTC
Package: Evolution
Priority: Normal
Version: 0.12.99
Synopsis: vFolder sources UI should be nicer
Bugzilla-Product: Evolution
Bugzilla-Component: Mailer

Description:
I find that listing off the whole address of the source folders in the vFolder sources window is kind of unneeded.  I'd like to see it SOMEHOW make it so the user doesn't see file:// and all the extra stuff.

Here's what I suggest.  We nest the New Folder window in the sources section.  We then put little check boxes next to each folder and you check each folder you want as a source.

Comment 1 Luis Villa 2001-08-02 20:19:00 UTC
For future reference, please do not remove me from the A field; if
anyone needs to be added they should go in the CC: field.
Comment 2 Luis Villa 2001-08-17 20:24:51 UTC
As a result of the UI freeze today, I'm marking all remaining non-1.0 UI bugs to
'future'. Someone reading this should only change the target back to 1.0 under
the following circumstances:
1) The change would not impact documentation. (i.e., 'how to do X' would not
have to be changed in any way.)
2) The change would require trivial work for the programmers involved. Most
likely, only the programmers themselves are able to judge this. So, if you are
not on the evo team, or cannot provide a patch to them for this, you should
probably not make any such changes. 
Sorry that this is going to impact so many irritating bugs, but we have to
prioritize our limited resources.
Comment 3 Nat Friedman 2001-10-12 07:38:09 UTC
Setting this to 1.1.
Comment 4 Not Zed 2001-10-20 00:48:41 UTC
Ugh, i'd rather not use the folder view, becase of the unecessary
complication required.

Anyway we can't because we might edit a vfolder which references
folders which aren't opened at the moment (on a store).

I dont see why this is 1.1 btw
Comment 5 Luis Villa 2001-10-21 19:46:16 UTC
I think nat set this to 1.1 with the presumption that part of 1.1 will
be general but simple UI polish (which this seems to be.)
Comment 6 Nat Friedman 2001-10-28 17:32:01 UTC
That is right.
Comment 7 Luis Villa 2001-11-26 17:04:59 UTC
Because of the decision to remap 1.1->1.2 and 1.2->1.4, I'm going to be
moving a large number of bugs around in the bugzilla. You can just
search on 'body contains' 'Because of the decision to remap' and mark
all as read. Please direct all questions about this change to
evolution@ximian.com, not the bug.
Luis

Comment 8 Not Zed 2001-12-08 01:31:43 UTC
Well anna, design a ui and we'll see if its pratical.

Hints: 
 Using the folder selection tree isn't pratical.
 And the folder name MUST include the protocol + path at least, only
having the folder name is bad and confusing.
Comment 9 Peter Williams 2002-08-01 18:12:48 UTC
anna: ping? Are you going to have time to do this?
Comment 10 Anna Marie Dirks 2002-08-05 17:01:27 UTC
Well hmm. 

So I have a patch for this working on my machine. I know, though, that
!Z has some problems with it. (Notably, he thinks I am removing
important options.) 

check out: http://primates.ximian.com/~anna/vfolders/

The first image there is not too different (well, I changed some of
the packing) from the current set-up. The second one, however, is what
happens when the user selects a non-specific folders option (the
folder picking stuff is hidden.) The last image in there has an
example of a nicer format for the folder names to be in. (eg, no
obtuse uris). 

So that is my recommendation. 
Comment 11 Peter Williams 2002-08-21 18:51:53 UTC
I think at least we could use the prettified names insteead of the
URIs... don't think there's any information loss there. Eg,
"{folderpath} in {accountname}" or "Local folder {foo}" or "VFolder {foo}"
Comment 12 Jeffrey Stedfast 2002-09-06 19:45:02 UTC
This needs to be postponed until some future release
Comment 13 André Klapper 2005-02-09 17:53:58 UTC
it's "mbox:Inbox/foo" in 2.1.4, any decision on this (anna/tigert)?
Comment 14 Calum Benson 2005-07-28 10:40:43 UTC
Apologies for any spam... cc'ing usability-maint on all Evolution usability
bugs. Filter on EVO-USABILITY-SPAM to ignore.
Comment 15 André Klapper 2006-07-06 10:34:26 UTC
it's "On this Computer:/Inbox/bla" in 2.7.3, so i'm closing this as fixed.