After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 168363 - Nautlius crashes when cancelling a UID/PW entry for an SMB resource
Nautlius crashes when cancelling a UID/PW entry for an SMB resource
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 134985
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.8.x
Other other
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-02-24 09:44 UTC by rodricyates
Modified: 2005-02-24 14:54 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.7/2.8



Description rodricyates 2005-02-24 09:44:44 UTC
Distribution: Debian testing/unstable
Package: nautilus
Severity: normal
Version: GNOME2.8.1 2.8.1
Gnome-Distributor: Ubuntu
Synopsis: Nautlius crashes when cancelling a UID/PW entry for an SMB resource
Bugzilla-Product: nautilus
Bugzilla-Component: general
Bugzilla-Version: 2.8.1
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.8.0)
Description:
Description of the crash:
Go to an SMB/CIFS server (in this case XP Home SP2), when you get the
uid/domain/pw dialogue box, click cancel.

Steps to reproduce the crash:
1. as above
2. 
3. 

Expected Results:
A Dialogue box telling me I didnt or cannot access the resource

How often does this happen?
Only tried it once so far (then this box popped up).

Additional Information:



Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)...Using host libthread_db library
"/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging
symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...[Thread debugging using
libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 1089446208 (LWP 22405)]
[New Thread 1101310896 (LWP 23131)]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 1089446208 (LWP 22405)]
[New Thread 1101310896 (LWP 23131)]
(no debugging symbols found)...[New Thread 1100184496 (LWP 22428)]
(no debugging symbols found)...[New Thread 1099750320 (LWP 22415)]
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging
symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...[Thread debugging using
libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 1089446208 (LWP 22405)]
[New Thread 1101310896 (LWP 23131)]
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging
symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 4 (Thread 1099750320 (LWP 22415))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 poll
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #2 g_main_loop_get_context
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #3 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #4 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #5 link_thread_io_context
    from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0
  • #6 ??
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #7 ??
  • #8 g_static_private_free
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2005-02-24 04:44 -------


Unknown version 2.8.1 in product nautilus.  Setting version to "2.8.x".
Unknown platform unknown. Setting to default platform "Other".
Unknown milestone "unknown" in product "nautilus".
   Setting to default milestone for this product, '---'
The original reporter of this bug does not have
   an account here. Reassigning to the person who moved
   it here, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org.
   Previous reporter was rodricyates@blueyonder.co.uk.
Setting to default status "UNCONFIRMED".
Setting qa contact to the default for this product.
   This bug either had no qa contact or an invalid one.

Comment 1 Elijah Newren 2005-02-24 14:54:00 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into
our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.

Matches the stack trace in bug 166346, which has been marked as a duplicate of
134985

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 134985 ***