After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 166135 - when trying to display a folder full of svg files, nautilus crashes
when trying to display a folder full of svg files, nautilus crashes
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 154346
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.8.x
Other other
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-02-03 08:42 UTC by olivier
Modified: 2005-02-03 09:57 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.7/2.8



Description olivier 2005-02-03 08:42:58 UTC
Distribution: Debian testing/unstable
Package: nautilus
Severity: normal
Version: GNOME2.8.1 2.8.1
Gnome-Distributor: Ubuntu
Synopsis: when trying to display a folder full of svg files, nautilus crashes
Bugzilla-Product: nautilus
Bugzilla-Component: general
Bugzilla-Version: 2.8.1
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.8.0)
Description:
Description of the crash:
when trying to display a folder full of svg files, nautilus crashes

Steps to reproduce the crash:
1. download openclipart 0.10	
2. open one of the folders - maximize window
3. try to scroll

Expected Results: crash


How often does this happen? every time if scrolling is needed


Additional Information:



Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)...Using host libthread_db library
"/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging
symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...[Thread debugging using
libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 1089462592 (LWP 4992)]
[New Thread 1101577136 (LWP 5000)]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 1089462592 (LWP 4992)]
[New Thread 1101577136 (LWP 5000)]
(no debugging symbols found)...[New Thread 1100897200 (LWP 4999)]
(no debugging symbols found)...[New Thread 1100630960 (LWP 4998)]
(no debugging symbols found)...[New Thread 1099971504 (LWP 4997)]
(no debugging symbols found)...[New Thread 1099664304 (LWP 4995)]
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging
symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 1089462592 (LWP 4992)]
[New Thread 1101577136 (LWP 5000)]
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging
symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 6 (Thread 1099664304 (LWP 4995))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 poll
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #2 g_main_loop_get_context
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #3 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #4 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #5 link_thread_io_context
    from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0
  • #6 ??
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #7 ??
  • #8 g_static_private_free
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2005-02-03 03:42 -------


Unknown version 2.8.1 in product nautilus.  Setting version to "2.8.x".
Unknown platform unknown. Setting to default platform "Other".
Unknown milestone "unknown" in product "nautilus".
   Setting to default milestone for this product, '---'
The original reporter of this bug does not have
   an account here. Reassigning to the person who moved
   it here, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org.
   Previous reporter was olivier@amnesix.net.
Setting to default status "UNCONFIRMED".
Setting qa contact to the default for this product.
   This bug either had no qa contact or an invalid one.

Comment 1 Sebastien Bacher 2005-02-03 09:57:58 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into
our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 154346 ***