After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 165795 - GTK+-2.6.1 crause a BadImplementation eror when used with XFree86 4.2.0 (Red Hat 7.2)
GTK+-2.6.1 crause a BadImplementation eror when used with XFree86 4.2.0 (Red ...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 164427
Product: gtk+
Classification: Platform
Component: Backend: X11
2.6.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: gtk-bugs
gtk-bugs
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-01-31 11:56 UTC by Olivier Fourdan
Modified: 2005-01-31 13:12 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
A patch that check for Xrender version (757 bytes, patch)
2005-01-31 11:58 UTC, Olivier Fourdan
none Details | Review

Description Olivier Fourdan 2005-01-31 11:56:54 UTC
Steps to reproduce:
1. compile gtk+-2.6.1
2. Set display to a RH72 box using XFree86 4.2.0
3. run testtext from the gtk+ test programs

Stack trace:
The program 'lt-testtext' received an X Window System error.
This probably reflects a bug in the program.
The error was 'BadImplementation (server does not implement operation)'.
  (Details: serial 286 error_code 17 request_code 152 minor_code 10)
  (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously;
   that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it.
   To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line
   option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful
   backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.)


Other information:
Comment 1 Olivier Fourdan 2005-01-31 11:58:53 UTC
Created attachment 36759 [details] [review]
A patch that check for Xrender version

The attached patch enables Xrender in gdk only if the X server supports Xrender
0.4 or later (dunno if that the exact version but that fixes the issue).
Comment 2 Matthias Clasen 2005-01-31 13:12:42 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 164427 ***