After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 162433 - gnome-terminal quits
gnome-terminal quits
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 163814
Product: vte
Classification: Core
Component: general
unspecified
Other other
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: VTE Maintainers
VTE Maintainers
: 162772 164024 167568 170177 173063 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2004-12-29 09:18 UTC by bjohnson
Modified: 2007-01-31 15:23 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.7/2.8



Description bjohnson 2004-12-29 09:18:55 UTC
Distribution: Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg)
Package: gnome-terminal
Severity: normal
Version: GNOME2.8.0 unspecified
Gnome-Distributor: Red Hat, Inc
Synopsis: gnome-terminal quits
Bugzilla-Product: gnome-terminal
Bugzilla-Component: general
Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.8.0)
Description:
Description of the crash:

Was typing in a gnome-terminal (session on the local host using vi) and
the notification popped up that gnome-terminal had quit.

Steps to reproduce the crash:
1. Unknown
2. 
3. 

Expected Results:
No crash of course


How often does this happen?
This system was install 1 week ago and this was the first time it
happened.


Additional Information:



Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-terminal'

(no debugging symbols found)...Using host libthread_db library
"/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging
symbols found)...[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -151107360 (LWP 3879)]
[New Thread 27200432 (LWP 3888)]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -151107360 (LWP 3879)]
[New Thread 27200432 (LWP 3888)]
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging
symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -151107360 (LWP 3879)]
[New Thread 27200432 (LWP 3888)]
0x0066b7a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2

Thread 1 (Thread -151107360 (LWP 3879))

  • #0 _dl_sysinfo_int80
    from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 libgnomeui_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 strcmp
    from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
  • #5 vte_terminal_get_text_range
    from /usr/lib/libvte.so.4
  • #6 g_main_context_wakeup
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #7 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #8 g_main_context_acquire
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #9 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #11 main




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2004-12-29 04:18 -------


Unknown platform unknown. Setting to default platform "Other".
Unknown milestone "unknown" in product "gnome-terminal".
   Setting to default milestone for this product, '---'
The original reporter of this bug does not have
   an account here. Reassigning to the person who moved
   it here, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org.
   Previous reporter was bjohnson@symetrix.com.
Setting to default status "UNCONFIRMED".
Setting qa contact to the default for this product.
   This bug either had no qa contact or an invalid one.

Comment 1 Olav Vitters 2004-12-29 11:29:16 UTC
Possible dupe of bug 160759.

Shows vte, moving.
Comment 2 Elijah Newren 2005-01-14 02:21:25 UTC
*** Bug 164024 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Elijah Newren 2005-02-16 09:31:05 UTC
*** Bug 167568 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Yaron Tausky 2005-03-13 21:57:04 UTC
*** Bug 170177 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Elijah Newren 2005-04-09 14:35:50 UTC
*** Bug 173063 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Michele Baldessari 2005-06-09 22:30:40 UTC
*** Bug 162772 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Chris Wilson 2007-01-31 15:23:50 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 163814 ***