After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 161650 - zoom for images
zoom for images
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: epiphany
Classification: Core
Component: Backend
git master
Other All
: Normal enhancement
: Ephy/XR
Assigned To: Xan Lopez
Epiphany Maintainers
: 327651 604648 (view as bug list)
Depends on: 167592
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2004-12-18 19:43 UTC by Christian Persch
Modified: 2012-01-31 18:20 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Christian Persch 2004-12-18 19:43:05 UTC
From bug 132240 comment 2:
> I'd rather have the Zoom functions actually zoom the image ;)
Comment 1 Lionel Dricot 2005-04-12 14:38:29 UTC
The behaviour of Firefox is really good :

- adapt the image to the window size
- click on it to see the orignal size.
Comment 2 Christian Persch 2006-01-19 22:59:14 UTC
*** Bug 327651 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Reinout van Schouwen 2006-01-20 09:08:06 UTC
Sorry, missed this one before filing 327651. 

Lionel: older versions of epiphany used the zoom method you describe but we didn't like it. Lots of images get really ugly if they are scaled back with mozilla's zoom algorithm.
Comment 4 Bruce Cowan 2006-05-21 19:14:58 UTC
Evolution does this now though, and it seems to do a better job than firefox's image zoom thing.
Comment 5 Reinout van Schouwen 2006-05-21 19:35:14 UTC
Evolution doesn't use gecko (the mozilla/firefox rendering component). Epiphany is dependent on the capabilities of gecko.
Comment 6 Christian Persch 2006-05-21 20:02:13 UTC
'Real' zooming will be possible when using gecko 1.9 thanks to cairo.
Comment 7 Christian Persch 2007-07-26 12:19:03 UTC
Possible now with gecko 1.9; see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4821 .
Comment 8 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-03-11 14:51:16 UTC
Originally, this bug was about not being able to zoom images.

As we use EOG for viewing images now (and only fallback to native viewing if EOG isn't available), that's really not important any more.

This bug can stay open for 'full page zoom', which bmo 4821 is about. But if we  have this, then we should make sure it works on the webkit backend too.
Comment 9 alp 2008-06-01 11:05:28 UTC
Moving to Backend:Webkit.

This feature can be implemented by setting the "full-content-zoom" property on WebView to TRUE.

It's probably worth waiting for the browser abstraction to get removed from trunk, rather than extending the EphyEmbed interface for this right now.
Comment 10 Luca Ferretti 2008-11-28 13:05:08 UTC
Using latest epiphany and webkit from version control, images are managed as described in comment 1.

The only issue I can see is the cursor icon update. The magnifier icon has plus or minus signs on it depending on zoom level; if you simply click but don't move the pointer, the cursor icon is not updated. But I suppose this is a WebKit bug...

IMHO this behavior is good for a web browser, any other image manipulation should perfomed by other apps.
If not, please update the bug summary to "variable zoom levels for images" or similar...
Comment 11 Michael Monreal 2009-02-25 00:33:00 UTC
What about enabling full page zoom in the WebKit backend now? I absolutely hated this when it was introduced in Firefox, but have learned to love it and now don't want to live without it :) Also, it looks like full page zoom is what all the new browser releases offer today, so let's stay current.
Comment 12 Jean-François Fortin Tam 2009-08-24 12:38:31 UTC
+1 for full page zoom. This is how Firefox 3.5 and Chromium behave, and it's quite nice. Remember those small fixed size designs like planet.gnome.org or cyberpresse.ca on huge (ex: 1920x1200) resolutions? Full page zoom allows you to see them much bigger, while prevent the layout from breaking.
Comment 13 Gustavo Noronha (kov) 2009-08-24 13:31:16 UTC
I agree. Notice that we still have some troubles with image quality when zooming in WebKitGTK+, though.
Comment 14 Michael Monreal 2009-08-24 15:14:32 UTC
(In reply to comment #13)
> Notice that we still have some troubles with image quality when
> zooming in WebKitGTK+, though.

Yeah but some page layouts really break *horribly* when using text-only zoom.
Comment 15 Reinout van Schouwen 2009-12-19 18:01:31 UTC
*** Bug 604648 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 16 Xan Lopez 2012-01-31 18:20:51 UTC
We have full page zoom by default now, so I guess this can be closed.