After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 157656 - gnome-terminal crash by vim6.3
gnome-terminal crash by vim6.3
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 139542
Product: gnome-applets
Classification: Other
Component: mini-commander
1.0.x
Other other
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: gnome-applets Maintainers
gnome-applets Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2004-11-08 13:13 UTC by stephen
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.5/2.6



Description stephen 2004-11-08 13:13:40 UTC
Distribution: Fedora Core release 2 (Tettnang)
Package: gnome-applets
Severity: blocker
Version: GNOME2.6. 2.6.0
Gnome-Distributor: Red Hat, Inc
Synopsis: gnome-terminal  crash by vim6.3
Bugzilla-Product: gnome-applets
Bugzilla-Component: mini-commander
Bugzilla-Version: 2.6.0
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.6.0)
Description:
Description of the crash:
When I used the vim6.3 built from source of vim6.3

A crash occurs
Steps to reproduce the crash:
1. vim
2. gnome-terminal crash
3. 

Expected Results:


How often does this happen?


Additional Information:



Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-terminal'

(no debugging symbols found)...Using host libthread_db library
"/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging
symbols found)...[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 713746208 (LWP 28604)]
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging
symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...0x00a22402 in ?? ()

Thread 1 (Thread 713746208 (LWP 28604))

  • #0 ??
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 libgnomeui_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 ??
  • #5 raise
    from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
  • #6 abort
    from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
  • #7 g_logv
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #8 g_log
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #9 g_string_erase
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 _g_log_fallback_handler
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #11 g_log_default_handler
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #12 g_logv
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #13 g_log
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #14 vte_terminal_set_default_colors
    from /usr/lib/libvte.so.4
  • #15 vte_terminal_fork_command
    from /usr/lib/libvte.so.4
  • #16 g_main_context_wakeup
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #17 g_main_depth
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #18 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #19 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #20 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #21 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #22 main
  • #0 ??




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2004-11-08 08:13 -------


Unknown version 2.6.0 in product gnome-applets. Setting version to "1.0.x".
Unknown platform unknown. Setting to default platform "Other".
Unknown milestone "unknown" in product "gnome-applets".
   Setting to default milestone for this product, '---'
The original reporter of this bug does not have
   an account here. Reassigning to the person who moved
   it here, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org.
   Previous reporter was ilovechemapao@yahoo.com.
Setting to default status "UNCONFIRMED".
Setting qa contact to the default for this product.
   This bug either had no qa contact or an invalid one.

Comment 1 Elijah Newren 2004-11-08 15:54:03 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into
our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.

Matches the stack trace in bug 153615, which has been marked as a duplicate of
139542.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 139542 ***