After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 156612 - Integration of libglade
Integration of libglade
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 161903
Product: glade
Classification: Applications
Component: general
unspecified
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Glade 3 Maintainers
Glade 3 Maintainers
: 156512 156513 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2004-10-27 17:55 UTC by Ivan Wong
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
necessary patch (of libglade) for integration of libglade into glade3 (6.58 KB, patch)
2004-10-27 17:58 UTC, Ivan Wong
none Details | Review
Saving using libglade (15.40 KB, patch)
2004-10-27 18:43 UTC, Ivan Wong
none Details | Review
Revised (15.59 KB, patch)
2004-10-28 10:44 UTC, Ivan Wong
none Details | Review
Saving and loading - prototype (39.93 KB, patch)
2004-11-07 17:35 UTC, Ivan Wong
none Details | Review
ChangeLog patch (2.04 KB, patch)
2004-11-08 10:55 UTC, Ivan Wong
none Details | Review
Revised (51.02 KB, patch)
2004-11-10 20:13 UTC, Ivan Wong
none Details | Review
Re-re-revised (37.18 KB, text/plain)
2004-11-15 18:41 UTC, Ivan Wong
  Details
Potential final patch (18.60 KB, patch)
2004-12-15 23:23 UTC, Tristan Van Berkom
none Details | Review

Description Ivan Wong 2004-10-27 17:55:16 UTC
What are the benefits of moving to libglade?

According to Tristan:

- Less code to maintain overall (ofcourse that means less bugs, both projects 
should benefit from eachother this way).
- Ganaunteed exact replicas of created glade files
Comment 1 Ivan Wong 2004-10-27 17:58:47 UTC
Created attachment 33136 [details] [review]
necessary patch (of libglade) for integration of libglade into glade3

This fixs libglade3's glade_interface_dump() and rename the type GladeProperty
(conflicts with Glade3's GladeProperty) to GladePropInfo
Comment 2 Ivan Wong 2004-10-27 18:43:12 UTC
Created attachment 33137 [details] [review]
Saving using libglade

This depends on the first patch (of libglade)
Comment 3 Ivan Wong 2004-10-28 10:44:52 UTC
Created attachment 33160 [details] [review]
Revised

It depends on the first patch (of libglade)
Comment 4 Ivan Wong 2004-11-07 17:35:34 UTC
Created attachment 33528 [details] [review]
Saving and loading - prototype
Comment 5 Ivan Wong 2004-11-08 10:55:28 UTC
Created attachment 33545 [details] [review]
ChangeLog patch
Comment 6 Ivan Wong 2004-11-10 20:13:32 UTC
Created attachment 33654 [details] [review]
Revised
Comment 7 Ivan Wong 2004-11-15 18:41:37 UTC
Created attachment 33814 [details]
Re-re-revised
Comment 8 David Hoover 2004-11-15 18:58:14 UTC
Comment on attachment 33814 [details]
Re-re-revised

Committed on the LIBGLADE_INTEGRATION branch
Comment 9 David Hoover 2004-11-15 19:07:49 UTC
*** Bug 156512 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 David Hoover 2004-11-15 19:08:20 UTC
*** Bug 156513 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Tristan Van Berkom 2004-12-15 23:23:03 UTC
Created attachment 34877 [details] [review]
Potential final patch

This patch integrates:
    - Ivan Wong's patch for loading with libglade
    - My patch to libglade for non-widget object support +
      implementation of g_module_lookup for user_data in signal handlers
    - Ivan Wong's patch for applications to startup correctly on win32
      platforms.

This patch is currently against libglade-2.4.0 and is nescisary to compile
and run glade-3 LIBGLADE_INTEGRATION branch.
Comment 12 Tristan Van Berkom 2004-12-15 23:24:31 UTC
Note that the last patch (Potential final patch) obsoletes the 
first original patch.
Comment 13 Archit Baweja 2004-12-19 01:24:14 UTC
Whats the status of this branch being merged into HEAD?
Comment 14 Tristan Van Berkom 2004-12-21 17:33:23 UTC
I'm closing this, the patch now will exist as libglade bugzilla.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 161903 ***