After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 148796 - gnome terminal horrible performance
gnome terminal horrible performance
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 122871
Product: gnome-terminal
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.6.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: GNOME Terminal Maintainers
GNOME Terminal Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2004-07-29 19:06 UTC by Florin Andrei
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.5/2.6



Description Florin Andrei 2004-07-29 19:06:41 UTC
Why does gnome-terminal takes so many resources to perform trivial tasks such as
scrolling text up?

Experiment: Run gnome-terminal and xterm side by side.

Do a "cat filename" on a very large file in each one of them and see which one
is faster.
xterm can be faster by orders of magnitude (i'm not making things up).

Compile an application that makes gcc very verbose in each terminal. With
gnome-terminal, the overall system load is significantly higher.

Run a "tail -f" on a log file, while at the same time running a time- and
load-sensitive application such as any digital sound recorder (Ardour with JACK)
or sequencer (Rosegarden, Muse).
If "tail -f" runs in gnome-terminal, and the time-critical app does not run with
real-time privileges, parts of the sound stream will get dropped. The drops
occur at a much lower frequency (if at all) when running "tail -f" in xterm.

I mean, gnome-terminal is nice and all, but why is it such a huge resource hog?

I am not the first one to raise a flag on this issue. gnome-terminal essentially
makes it difficult to do time-critical work on a Gnome workstation.
I actually avoid using it.
Comment 1 Dimitrios 2004-08-01 15:11:33 UTC
This is a duplicate of bug #122871

Yes, gnome-terminal is crap in performance. No, actually, its even worse than
that :)

Comment 2 Mariano Suárez-Alvarez 2004-08-02 20:09:58 UTC
I have to confess that comments like that do certainly not motivate me.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 122871 ***