After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 145582 - label.set_justify(JUSTIFY_FILL) seems not to work with me
label.set_justify(JUSTIFY_FILL) seems not to work with me
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 64538
Product: gtk+
Classification: Platform
Component: Widget: Other
2.0.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this now (help wanted and appreciated)
Python bindings maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2004-07-07 19:29 UTC by marc
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.3/2.4



Description marc 2004-07-07 19:29:23 UTC
With the following code I get a label. The text inside the label should be 
justified across the label (since I asked JUSTIFY_FILL). But It does not work 
(with me, at least :-). JUSTIFY_LEFT, _RIGHT and _CENTER work, but not _FILL
*****************************************
import gtk 

fenetre = gtk.Window(gtk.WINDOW_TOPLEVEL) 
label = gtk.Label("blabla bla bla blabla bla bla bla-blabla, blabla blabla. 
Blablabla bla blabla bla blabla blabla blablabla bla bla. Blabla bla bla 
blablablabla bla bla bla blabla. Blabla blabla blablabla. Bla blabla bla bla, 
bla bla bla.\nBla blabla bla blablabla.\nBlabla bla blabla bla, blabla, blabla 
blablabla. Bla bla blabla bla bla bla, blablablablabla.") 

label.set_line_wrap(gtk.TRUE) 
label.set_justify(gtk.JUSTIFY_FILL) 

fenetre.add(label) 
fenetre.show_all() 

gtk.main()
*****************************************
In the GTK+ tutorial, the screenshot at the "Labels" section shows a non-
justified (non filled) label too (but it SHOULD normally be, because of 
JUSTIFY_FILL)
Comment 1 John Finlay 2004-07-07 20:11:42 UTC
I think that this is a GTK+ bug.
Comment 2 Gustavo Carneiro 2004-07-07 22:47:18 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 64538 ***