GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 144964
OFX import misses transactions
Last modified: 2018-06-29 20:44:26 UTC
When doing OFX import of transactions, some of them get missed out. I could not so far figure the pattern out, and this seems to have happened only on a single file I had (albeit it contains transactions for 3 different accounts in different currencies) -- or at least I have not seen it before. An offending sample file can be provided, but I would not want to post it to the web/bugzilla directly...
I am having the same problem. The problem files are OFX 2.0 format. I had a similar problem earlier caused by a typo in an element name in the file. This time, the files validate against the OFX 2.0.0 DTD. There are some warnings printed out when importing the file: LibOFX INFO: libofx_proc_file(): Detected file format: OFX (Open Financial eXchange (OFX or QFX)) (Above message occured on Line 4294967295, Column 4294967295) LibOFX INFO: Created OfxDummyContainer to hold unsupported aggregate SIGNONMSGSRSV1 (Above message occured on Line 2, Column 1) LibOFX INFO: Created OfxDummyContainer to hold unsupported aggregate SONRS (Above message occured on Line 3, Column 1) LibOFX INFO: Created OfxDummyContainer to hold unsupported aggregate FI (Above message occured on Line 10, Column 1) LibOFX INFO: Created OfxDummyContainer to hold unsupported aggregate BANKMSGSRSV1 (Above message occured on Line 16, Column 1) LibOFX INFO: Created OfxDummyContainer to hold unsupported aggregate STMTTRNRS (Above message occured on Line 17, Column 1) WRITEME: ofx_proc_account() Fill in the account type, default name, currency, etc. Error: ofx_proc_transaction_cb: WRITEME: Gnucash ofx_proc_transaction():Add PAYEE and ADRESS here once supported by libofx!
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. However, in order to fix it we would need a really easy way to reproduce the behaviour. If you have an OFX file where some transactions are left out, is there any chance you could extract the relevant part of the file (e.g. leaving only two transactions in there, one that is read correctly, the other "forgotten") and you could of course anonymize any data in there before adding it here as an attachment. If anyone has time and can still reproduce the bug, please read http://bugzilla.gnome.org/bug-HOWTO.html and add a more useful description to this bug.
Closing this bug report as no further information has been provided. Please feel free to reopen this bug if you can provide the information asked for. Thanks!
GnuCash bug tracking has moved to a new Bugzilla host. This bug has been copied to https://bugs.gnucash.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144964. Please update any external references or bookmarks.