After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 142772 - gnopernicus does not read gnome-terminal output on the fly
gnopernicus does not read gnome-terminal output on the fly
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: gnopernicus
Classification: Deprecated
Component: speech
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal major
: ---
Assigned To: remus draica
remus draica
AP3
: 154776 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2004-05-19 13:27 UTC by david.hawthorne
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.7/2.8



Description david.hawthorne 2004-05-19 13:27:06 UTC
-launch gnopernicus
-launch gnome-terminal
-type 'ls'

.gnopernicus does not read the newly displayed text.

the only way to read this appears to be using the 'read whole window' function.
Even then this is a slow and tedious method. Am I missing something?
Comment 1 remus draica 2004-05-31 12:41:46 UTC
This is the normal behaviour for gnopernicus. If a command generates a lot of
output, that output is reported by at-spi as many "text-insert" events. Because
of that, gnopernicus cannot distingues between "text-insert" events as result of
a single user action and same situation, when output is result of many user actions.

Because of that, this bug will not be fixed in gnopernicus.
Comment 2 david.hawthorne 2004-05-31 12:48:47 UTC
If not then please reassign to the component which can fix this, it can't just
be dropped.
Comment 3 korn 2004-06-01 06:42:27 UTC
I think the answer here is to move to a new event handling scheme (much
discussed over the past month or so), where all output is queued except when
clearly generated from a user action, in which case all output is interrupted.  

I think this should therefore remain a Gnopernicus bug.
Comment 4 korn 2004-06-07 16:10:33 UTC
Will not fix for Gnopernicus 1.0.  The ideal behavior is much more complex and
sophisticated to implement.  For now the user will simply use screen review.
Comment 5 bill.haneman 2004-06-07 16:13:02 UTC
David: Marc confirmed that it's normal for the default mode of speech for
terminals _not_ to speak all output; the user normally has to use some sort of
review (or use some sort of virtual text caret) in order to review the text
that's been output.  There are some gnopernicus (and gnome-terminal) RFEs that
probably should be filed, longer-term, but the current default is probably
correct for 1.0.
Comment 6 Alexandra Telescu 2004-10-07 13:38:05 UTC
*** Bug 154776 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***