After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 130632 - Ctrl+Alt+Delete system monitor keybinding
Ctrl+Alt+Delete system monitor keybinding
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Product: metacity
Classification: Other
Component: general
2.6.x
Other Linux
: High enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Metacity maintainers list
Metacity maintainers list
: 343864 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks: 130634 143238 155462
 
 
Reported: 2004-01-06 01:59 UTC by Glynn Foster
Modified: 2020-11-07 12:36 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
control+alt+delete process manager keybinding (4.93 KB, patch)
2004-01-06 02:00 UTC, Glynn Foster
rejected Details | Review
panel patch (31.99 KB, patch)
2004-06-10 17:26 UTC, Mark McLoughlin
needs-work Details | Review
screenshot (45.82 KB, image/png)
2004-06-10 17:30 UTC, Mark McLoughlin
  Details

Description Glynn Foster 2004-01-06 01:59:33 UTC
Okay, so this was a JDS patch that people wanted. Not sure if it makes
sense or not. Cc'ing Calum and co.
Comment 1 Glynn Foster 2004-01-06 02:00:24 UTC
Created attachment 22976 [details] [review]
control+alt+delete process manager keybinding
Comment 2 Havoc Pennington 2004-01-06 02:51:45 UTC
Looks fine to me.
Comment 3 Bryan W Clark 2004-01-06 03:20:31 UTC
I see no problem with the inclusion of this patch.  The keybinding has
no other intuitive meaning behind it except for panic stricken windows
users and we should make them feel at home.
Comment 4 Calum Benson 2004-01-06 17:26:27 UTC
No objections here either.  How does this affect bugs #99335/#97174? 
Should we file a bug asking for "Log Out" to be added to gprocview or
something instead, as per the Windoze process viewer?
Comment 5 Rob Adams 2004-01-10 17:07:44 UTC
marking high because of the patch
Comment 6 Rob Adams 2004-01-10 17:27:07 UTC
Well, we definitely can't do this patch unless we update the HIG.  I
think that it's a good idea to have both a logout shortcut and a
process manager shortcut.  The HIG draft lists Ctrl-Alt-Del as the
logout shortcut.  Personally I like the idea of Ctrl-Alt-Del for the
process manager.  What should we use for logout?
Comment 7 Calum Benson 2004-01-13 13:25:37 UTC
Reminder (from bug #99335) of how other desktops do it:

Windows XP: Press Windows key (or Ctrl+Esc), then U. 
Or: focus desktop, then Alt-F4.
Or: ctrl-alt-del to pop up the task manager, then File->Log Out (or
something, it's on the task manager menu somewhere anyway).

OSX: Command-Shift-Q.

CDE: no keyboard shortcut
Comment 8 Luis Villa 2004-02-14 05:38:32 UTC
Calum: you're the usability guy, make a call :)
Comment 9 Rob Adams 2004-02-15 06:07:14 UTC
While a call would be nice, it's not super-urgent since this change
breaks every kind of freeze there is.
Comment 10 Reinout van Schouwen 2004-02-16 11:18:14 UTC
Call me old-fashioned, but Ctrl+Alt+Del means nothing but "reboot" to
me. IMHO we shouldn't touch this keybinding and let the distro decide
if it will do a reboot or not.
Comment 11 Brian "netdragon" Bober 2004-05-25 19:52:38 UTC
There are two very important uses for this: First to end a program, like a
frozen fullscreen application, and the second to start a program, like restart
nautilus when it freezes. Please don't make this window system modal or
top-level, but do make it so that you can only have one open at a time. Also,
please allow resource monitor functionality within a tab of this window, along
with statistics for running processes, such as mem usage, etc, with choosable
columns like on Windows 2000/XP.

Thanks :-)
Comment 12 Rob Adams 2004-05-25 21:36:36 UTC
The program already exists; it's called gnome-system-monitor, and yes, it is
tricked out and bitchin.  It's just a matter of creating a metacity shortcut to
launch it.

You can add a launcher for it a panel in the meantime, or use gconf-editor to
configure metacity to launch gnome-system-monitor in response to a keyboard
shortcut of your choosing.
Comment 13 Brian "netdragon" Bober 2004-05-26 00:24:57 UTC
Its missing some integral things (at as of Gnome 2.6 if it hasn't been changed),
such as a "Run" option, an Applications list (as opposed to the processes list
which shows more than simply user-launched applications), and "Shut down", "Log
out", etc. Another thing is that you can launch more than one instance of System
Monitor at the same time.
Comment 14 Rob Adams 2004-05-26 15:57:05 UTC
...all of which are feature requests that do not belong on a metacity bug report.
Comment 15 Brian "netdragon" Bober 2004-05-26 18:46:45 UTC
My bug was marked duplicate of this bug, and if what I requested is not covered
in this bug, then please make my bug depend on this one instead of marking it
duplicate. I'll go change that now.
Comment 16 Brian "netdragon" Bober 2004-05-26 18:59:50 UTC
I guess it wasn't marked dup but was actually marked CLOSED UPSTREAM on
bugzilla.redhat.com https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120507
(got this mixed up with another bug I recently filed) with a reference to this
bug, so I'm not exactly sure what to do in this case. Should I open a new bug or
bugs within Gnome under "system-monitor" specifically for an enhancement request
on the assumption this gets checked in, or should there be a META bug? 
Comment 17 Rob Adams 2004-05-26 19:09:51 UTC
you should open a new bug in GNOME bugzilla with your feature requests against
system monitor.  
Comment 18 Brian "netdragon" Bober 2004-05-26 20:23:58 UTC
Bug 143235 - Log out, shut down, restart, standby menu within system monitor
Bug 143236 - "Run applcation" option from within system monitor
Bug 143238 - Add Applications tab to system monitor
Comment 19 Calum Benson 2004-06-10 16:58:11 UTC
I'm pretty sure Mark McLoughlin hacked together many of these features for a JDS
version of system-monitor that we never used in the end... cc'ing him to make
sure he takes a look at these bugs and contributes any code he still has lying
around :)
Comment 20 Mark McLoughlin 2004-06-10 17:25:47 UTC
Okay, what I did was make the panel handle Ctrl-Alt-Delete by popping up a
dialog offering the choice of logout/lock screen/system monitor/xkill.

Attaching out of date patch and ugly screenshot, but this isn't very useful to
anyone if we're going to do all this in gnome-system-monitor.
Comment 21 Mark McLoughlin 2004-06-10 17:26:40 UTC
Created attachment 28564 [details] [review]
panel patch
Comment 22 Mark McLoughlin 2004-06-10 17:30:40 UTC
Created attachment 28565 [details]
screenshot
Comment 23 Mark McLoughlin 2004-06-10 17:36:29 UTC
Hmm, I see you want to do an "Applications" tab in gnome-system-monitor. I did
something very like that too as a demo, that code may be useful. 

However, I don't have access to it anymore ... Calum does, though. Calum - its
gnome-app-manager in dtcvs, I think there's only a gnome-app-manager.c which is
relevant. Can't remember for sure, though.
Comment 24 Calum Benson 2004-06-17 11:30:59 UTC
(I've uploaded Mark's old app-manager code to bug 143238).
Comment 25 Elijah Newren 2004-08-24 16:29:52 UTC
See also bug 150669 which has a conflicting request and has the Gnome 2.8
milestone set.
Comment 26 Chris Lahey 2004-12-20 22:07:31 UTC
Just as random useless information, C-M-delete does mean something in emacs.  It
runs backward-kill-sexp.  Coincidentally, the same thing C-M-backspace does
(don't try this if You don't have DontZap turned on.  If You don't know what
DontZap is, You probably don't have it turned on.)

Just thought people might be amusing by that information.
Comment 27 Thomas Thurman 2006-04-03 00:35:25 UTC
If we added bindings for launching gnome-system-monitor, and for logging out (even if they didn't have anything bound to them by default), would that close these bugs? Or are we waiting for guidance from elsewhere?
Comment 28 Elijah Newren 2006-04-16 07:00:21 UTC
We used to be waiting for a usability call for whether to implement this request or the one in bug 150669.  But (as noted in bug 150669), Calum made that call now in bug 99335:

  "If nobody else on the usability team is willing to make the call, I'd be
  happy to support anyone who wanted to make "Ctrl-Alt-Del = System monitor
  with a prominent logout button" :)"

So, I guess the next step is to convince the gnome-system-monitor people to add a prominent logout button.  Then add a binding to launch gnome-system-monitor and bind it to Ctrl-Alt-Del by default.
Comment 29 Thomas Thurman 2006-04-17 16:55:55 UTC
Is attachment 22976 [details] [review] still the sort of thing we need (modulo any code rot)?
Comment 30 Elijah Newren 2006-04-17 19:00:16 UTC
Yes, though we also need a prominent logout button in gnome-system-monitor.  :-)
Comment 31 Thomas Thurman 2006-04-19 16:21:38 UTC
Okay, bug 339048 is the prominent logout button in gnome-system-monitor and bug 339049 is the relevant changes to gnome-panel to make it put the dialogue up.
Comment 32 Elijah Newren 2006-06-05 02:10:43 UTC
*** Bug 343864 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 33 antistress 2009-03-05 08:37:10 UTC
i really like the suggestion posted on Metacity blog : http://blogs.gnome.org/metacity/2009/03/05/squib-of-the-day-ctrl-alt-delete/comment-page-1/#comment-831
(see mockup in comment #5)
Maybe pressing Ctrl+Alt+Delete should open a dialog box with :

_____________________________
|                           |
| o Open the system monitor |
| o Log out                 |
| o Shut down               |
|                           |
|           Cancel | Ok     |
_____________________________
Comment 34 André Klapper 2020-11-07 12:36:43 UTC
bugzilla.gnome.org is being replaced by gitlab.gnome.org. We are closing all
old feature requests in Bugzilla which have not seen updates for many years.

If you still use metacity and if you are still requesting this feature in a currently supported version of GNOME (currently that would be 3.38), then please feel free to report it at https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/-/issues/

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry it could not be implemented.