GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 124219
gnome-terminal crashed (no transparent backgrounds involved)
Last modified: 2004-12-22 21:47:04 UTC
Package: gnome-terminal Severity: normal Version: 2.0.1 Synopsis: gnome-terminal crashed (no transparent backgrounds involved) Bugzilla-Product: gnome-terminal Bugzilla-Component: general BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.0.3) Description: Description of Problem: Note: This "Bug Buddy" shows a known bug relating to gnome-terminal with transparent backgrounds. I do not have any transparent backgrounds, so I consider my occurrence a different bug (could be wrong, of course) I had 11 gnome-terminal windows open, spread across 5 desktops (running GNOME, metacity window manager, various other apps). Two windows were running mutt, one had trn. gnome-terminal crashed (taking out all of my windows - back to xterms for me !). The only action I can think of that may be related to the crash - I resized one of the windows running mutt while downloading a large amount of mail - mutt would have been sent a SIGWINCH, but it looks like it doesn't respond to it until after it has finished downloading messages. I was on a different desktop to the mutt window at the time of the crash, so I don't know if mutt resized successfully or not. Steps to reproduce the problem: 1. 2. 3. Actual Results: Expected Results: How often does this happen? Twice in recent time, in both cases with multiple windows spread across multiple desktops. Additional Information: Debugging Information: Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-terminal' (no debugging symbols found)...[New Thread 8192 (LWP 6706)] 0x420ae169 in wait4 () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
+ Trace 40728
Thread 1 (Thread 8192 (LWP 6706))
------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2003-10-09 11:35 ------- The original reporter (david.cook+gbg@pobox.com) of this bug does not have an account here. Reassigning to the exporter, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org. Reassigning to the default owner of the component, gnome-terminal-maint@bugzilla.gnome.org.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 94509 ***