After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 122742 - gok should not word-complete PASSWORD fields
gok should not word-complete PASSWORD fields
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gok
Classification: Deprecated
Component: general
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: bill.haneman
bill.haneman
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2003-09-19 15:19 UTC by bill.haneman
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
patch to suppress word completion for SPI_ROLE_PASSWORD_TEXT fields. Doesn't suppress text-manip or repeat-next tho. (3.47 KB, patch)
2003-09-19 15:45 UTC, bill.haneman
none Details | Review

Description bill.haneman 2003-09-19 15:19:30 UTC
if the currently focussed text entry field has ROLE_PASSWORD, gok shouldn't
do word completion (since that would be a security violation).  Similarly,
text manipulation of password fields probably makes little or no sense.

See the related --login mode bug 122641
Comment 1 bill.haneman 2003-09-19 15:45:37 UTC
Created attachment 20102 [details] [review]
patch to suppress word completion for SPI_ROLE_PASSWORD_TEXT fields.  Doesn't suppress text-manip or repeat-next tho.
Comment 2 bill.haneman 2003-09-19 15:47:32 UTC
David: do you think this patch is sufficient, or should we suppress
repeat and text-manipulation too?
(I think that if one does copy/paste from at-spi's PASSWORD fields,
one gets substitution/placeholder chars so I don't think that 'copy',
for instance, will result in a security violation)

Comment 3 bill.haneman 2003-09-19 15:48:33 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 106740 ***
Comment 4 bill.haneman 2003-09-19 15:49:18 UTC
oops, didn't mean to dup this
Comment 5 bill.haneman 2003-09-19 16:40:22 UTC
removing status-whiteboard, 'cause we don't use it for AT-component
bugs, oops
Comment 6 bill.haneman 2003-09-26 07:52:05 UTC
David, OK to apply this patch?
Comment 7 David Bolter 2003-10-01 18:47:03 UTC
Bill, I think this bug is closable. I'm not strongly opinionated on
the text manip. and repeat question.  Sorry for the delay in
responding to this bug directly (though I think I responded in email).