After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 114599 - jut going to superuser and it went hairwire
jut going to superuser and it went hairwire
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 104589
Product: gnome-terminal
Classification: Core
Component: general
unspecified
Other other
: Normal critical
: ---
Assigned To: Havoc Pennington
GNOME Terminal Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2003-06-06 20:28 UTC by lazijunkie
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description lazijunkie 2003-06-06 21:30:49 UTC
Package: gnome-terminal
Severity: critical
Version: 2.2.1
Synopsis: jut going to superuser and it went hairwire
Bugzilla-Product: gnome-terminal
Bugzilla-Component: general
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.2.0.1)

Description:
Description of Problem:


Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. 
2. 
3. 

Actual Results:


Expected Results:


How often does this happen?


Additional Information:




Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-terminal'

(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...[New
Thread 1087411936 (LWP 26197)]

(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...0xffffe002
in ??
    ()

Thread 1 (Thread 1087411936 (LWP 26197))

  • #0 ??
  • #1 libgnomeui_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #2 <signal handler called>
  • #3 gdk_event_get_graphics_expose
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #4 gdk_add_client_message_filter
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #5 _gdk_events_queue
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #6 _gdk_events_queue
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #7 g_get_current_time
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #8 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #9 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #11 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #12 main
  • #13 __libc_start_main
    from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
  • #0 ??




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2003-06-06 17:30 -------

The original reporter (lazijunkie@yahoo.com) of this bug does not have an account here.
Reassigning to the exporter, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org.
Reassigning to the default owner of the component, hp@redhat.com.

Comment 1 Elijah Newren 2003-06-10 05:43:40 UTC
This looks like the mysterious gtk+ crash that is showing up
everywhere [See specifically bug 105745 for more info].
                                                                     
          
A number of people are getting this, but the stack traces are
unfortunately useless and we don't know how to reproduce the problem.
Can you get a stacktrace with symbols for us?
                                                                     
          
[If you're using RedHat 9, you can do so with the following easy
method; otherwise this will require recompiling from source:
                                                                     
          
  Install
  http://people.redhat.com/otaylor/tmp/gtk2-debuginfo-2.2.1-4.i386.rpm
  and if the problem occurs again, submit the backtrace you get.
  Installing the debuginfo package will make the backtrace much more
  useful.]
                                                                     
          
I am adding myself to the cc and marking as needinfo for now.
Comment 2 Kjartan Maraas 2003-06-17 15:13:56 UTC
Marking as duplicate.
Comment 3 Kjartan Maraas 2003-06-17 15:14:12 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 104589 ***