After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 111773 - A couple of unclear strings
A couple of unclear strings
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 106702
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: Internationalization (i18n)
2.2.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
: 111774 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2003-04-28 18:34 UTC by Danilo Segan
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Danilo Segan 2003-04-28 18:34:58 UTC 
Most of the strings mentioned at
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106702 are those lacking ngettext
support, but here're a few more for Nautilus 2.2 (this is not duplicate of
that bug, but rather a complement)

#: libnautilus-private/nautilus-file.c:3942
#, c-format
msgid "%u items"

#: libnautilus-private/nautilus-file.c:3942
#, c-format
msgid "%u folders"

# bug: plural-forms
#: libnautilus-private/nautilus-file.c:3943
#, c-format
msgid "%u files"


Also, there are a few not related to plural forms:

#: libnautilus-private/filesystem-attributes.xml.h:9
msgid "Ext2 Linux Volume"

This one is ambigios since I don't think Nautilus is able to differentiate
between GNU and GNU/Linux ext2 volumes (at least it reports all my GNU ext2
partitions as Linux ext2 volumes, which they're clearly not).

Ext3 is (still) not supported by GNU Hurd ext2fs translator, but that might
change soon, so that one should have Linux excluded also.
Comment 1 Danilo Segan 2003-04-28 18:37:04 UTC 
*** Bug 111774 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Christian Rose 2003-04-28 19:11:55 UTC 
If you have additional messages with the plural problem, please add
those as comments to the existing bug report, bug 106702. I'll mark
this report as a duplicate of that one.

As for the other problem, it seems (to me) to be entirely unrelated to
the plural issue. Hence, please put that in a seperate bug report.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 106702 ***