After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 101433 - gnome-control-center build fails on Solaris - 17 Dec 2002
gnome-control-center build fails on Solaris - 17 Dec 2002
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gnome-control-center
Classification: Core
Component: general
unspecified
Other Solaris
: Urgent critical
: ---
Assigned To: Control-Center Maintainers
Control-Center Maintainers
: 102725 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-12-17 10:01 UTC by Ashok Venkiteswaran
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
Patch (1.26 KB, patch)
2002-12-30 21:45 UTC, Andrew Sobala 		none Details | Review

Description Ashok Venkiteswaran 2002-12-17 10:01:04 UTC 
gnome-control-center fails to build for latest CVS head sources with the 
following error on Solaris 2.9 OS using forte compiler Build passes 
successfully on RH 7.1. 

"gnome-window-manager.c", line 120: void function cannot return value
cc: acomp failed for gnome-window-manager.c
make[2]: *** [gnome-window-manager.lo] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/gnome-2.9/src-2.0n-16Dec02/gnome-control-
center/libwindow-settings'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/gnome-2.9/src-2.0n-16Dec02/gnome-control-
center'
make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
--->8--- output of make command ends ------

ERROR: Failed to compile package gnome-control-center (2)
Comment 1 Andrew Sobala 2002-12-17 14:06:44 UTC 
Marking urgent since this blocks testing on Solaris, though I can't 
test/confirm.
Comment 2 Andrew Sobala 2002-12-30 21:45:44 UTC 
Created attachment 13285 [details] [review]
Patch
Comment 3 Andrew Sobala 2002-12-30 21:45:58 UTC 
Can I commit this?
Comment 4 Jody Goldberg 2002-12-30 22:00:16 UTC 
Already fixed in CVS.
Thanks
Comment 5 Andrew Sobala 2003-01-07 15:43:52 UTC 
*** Bug 102725 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Andrew Sobala 2003-01-07 15:45:22 UTC 
Jody: urm... phone a friend? :)

Reopening.
Comment 7 Jody Goldberg 2003-01-07 16:31:18 UTC 
This is still there ?
Comment 8 Andrew Sobala 2003-01-07 16:36:31 UTC 
Yup. And Wipro reported it again.
Comment 9 Jody Goldberg 2003-01-08 05:40:15 UTC 
Trivial fix made.  Sorry for the delay I had assumed something this silly had
been taken care of long ago.