After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 95238 - Crash in gdk_pixbuf_scale_simple
Crash in gdk_pixbuf_scale_simple
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Product: system-monitor
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.0.x
Other other
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: System-monitor maintainers
System-monitor maintainers
: 86453 99130 102248 103161 104377 104742 105515 110158 110442 111989 112754 112792 114490 115742 115874 116055 120856 121854 122172 122750 123231 123332 124543 124728 124900 124935 125525 125650 126565 127033 127044 128203 129042 135224 136838 136981 139213 140656 146078 146676 301670 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-10-09 01:51 UTC by miguel
Modified: 2011-11-11 10:03 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description miguel 2002-10-09 01:51:34 UTC 
Package: gnome-system-tools
Severity: normal
Version: 2.0.0
Synopsis: la aplicacion se cerro con error sin mas
Bugzilla-Product: gnome-system-tools
Bugzilla-Component: general
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.0.3)

Description:
Description of Problem:


Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. 
2. 
3. 

Actual Results:


Expected Results:


How often does this happen?


Additional Information:




Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-system-monitor'

(no debugging symbols found)...[New Thread 8192 (LWP 1589)]
0x420ae169 in wait4 () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6

+ Trace 28495

Thread 1 (Thread 8192 (LWP 1589))

  • #0 wait4
    from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
  • #1 __DTOR_END__
    from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
  • #2 waitpid
    from /lib/i686/libpthread.so.0
  • #3 libgnomeui_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #4 __pthread_sighandler
    from /lib/i686/libpthread.so.0
  • #5 <signal handler called>
  • #6 process_pixel
    from /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0
  • #7 pixops_process
    from /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0
  • #8 pixops_scale
    from /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0
  • #9 gdk_pixbuf_scale
    from /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0
  • #10 gdk_pixbuf_scale_simple
    from /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0
  • #11 pretty_table_get_icon
  • #12 get_info
  • #13 refresh_list
  • #14 proctable_update_list
  • #15 proctable_update_all
  • #16 cb_timeout
  • #17 g_timeout_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #18 g_main_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #19 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #20 g_main_context_iterate
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #21 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #22 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #23 main
  • #24 __libc_start_main
    from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
  • #0 wait4
    from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2002-10-08 21:51 -------

The original reporter (miguel@quanticom.net) of this bug does not have an account here.
Reassigning to the exporter, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org.
Reassigning to the default owner of the component, garparr@teleline.es.
Comment 1 David Kennedy 2002-10-24 23:02:44 UTC 
Note that 85240 and 93467 appear to be duplicates of this bug (not
resolving to minimize spam).
Comment 2 Luis Villa 2002-11-07 19:44:51 UTC 
Apologies for the spam- I'm removing 'bugsquad' from some keywords via the web
interface. This is a one-time only thing before I re-add bugsquad via the SQL
interface, which will generate no mail. Apologies again.
Comment 3 David Kennedy 2002-11-20 23:52:35 UTC 
*** Bug 99130 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Kevin Vandersloot 2002-11-26 01:31:32 UTC 
*** Bug 86453 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 David Kennedy 2002-12-31 06:03:09 UTC 
*** Bug 102248 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Alex Duggan 2003-01-25 15:50:10 UTC 
*** Bug 104377 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Alex Duggan 2003-01-29 22:50:48 UTC 
*** Bug 104742 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Elijah Newren 2003-02-07 21:21:17 UTC 
*** Bug 105515 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Kevin Vandersloot 2003-02-14 02:10:25 UTC 
*** Bug 103161 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Kevin Vandersloot 2003-02-23 22:30:42 UTC 
I put in some changes in HEAD that may fix this bug. If someone can
repeatadly reproduce this bug then please try HEAD to see if it is fixed.
Comment 11 Kevin Vandersloot 2003-04-07 14:51:31 UTC 
*** Bug 110158 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Kevin Vandersloot 2003-04-10 14:43:21 UTC 
*** Bug 110442 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13 Kevin Vandersloot 2003-05-09 17:33:03 UTC 
*** Bug 111989 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 14 Elijah Newren 2003-05-11 05:21:54 UTC 
*** Bug 112754 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 15 Elijah Newren 2003-05-14 04:54:31 UTC 
*** Bug 112792 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 16 Elijah Newren 2003-06-12 02:48:14 UTC 
*** Bug 114490 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 17 David Kennedy 2003-06-24 21:19:34 UTC 
*** Bug 115874 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 18 David Kennedy 2003-06-24 21:20:11 UTC 
The trace in 115874 is quite detailed
Comment 19 Chris Davidson 2003-06-27 00:05:49 UTC 
*** Bug 116055 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 20 Elijah Newren 2003-07-04 22:57:13 UTC 
*** Bug 115742 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 21 Elijah Newren 2003-07-04 22:59:48 UTC 
The reporter of bug 115742 was using Red Hat 9.  Thus it appears that
this hasn't been fixed (or that Red Hat used a version from before
Kevin's changes on 2003-02-23).

Also, as David Kennedy said, bug 115874 contains debugging symbols.

I'm changing GNOMEVER2.0->GNOMEVER2.2 due to the most recent duplicate.
Comment 22 Kevin Vandersloot 2003-07-07 21:15:23 UTC 
The fix is only in the 2.3.x release I beleive. It looks like he is
using 2.0.4 on RH 9 (from his list of modules).

Note that there isn't really a gnome-system-monitor 2.2.x
Comment 23 Elijah Newren 2003-08-27 20:21:30 UTC 
*** Bug 120856 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 24 Vincent Untz 2003-10-03 09:35:30 UTC 
*** Bug 121854 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 25 Vincent Untz 2003-10-03 09:35:39 UTC 
*** Bug 122172 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 26 Vincent Untz 2003-10-03 09:35:47 UTC 
*** Bug 123231 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 27 Vincent Untz 2003-10-03 09:46:16 UTC 
*** Bug 123332 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 28 Kevin Vandersloot 2003-10-21 23:21:18 UTC 
*** Bug 124935 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 29 Kevin Vandersloot 2003-10-21 23:22:00 UTC 
*** Bug 122750 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 30 Kevin Vandersloot 2003-10-21 23:22:30 UTC 
*** Bug 124543 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 31 Kevin Vandersloot 2003-10-21 23:24:27 UTC 
*** Bug 124900 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 32 Vincent Untz 2003-10-29 14:58:24 UTC 
*** Bug 125525 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 33 Vincent Untz 2003-10-29 14:58:32 UTC 
*** Bug 124728 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 34 Vincent Untz 2003-10-29 14:58:40 UTC 
*** Bug 125650 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 35 Olav Vitters 2003-11-15 12:50:23 UTC 
*** Bug 127033 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 36 Olav Vitters 2003-11-15 12:50:33 UTC 
*** Bug 126565 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 37 Olav Vitters 2003-11-15 12:53:20 UTC 
*** Bug 127044 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 38 Kevin Vandersloot 2003-12-02 01:42:16 UTC 
*** Bug 128203 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 39 Elijah Newren 2003-12-11 00:40:25 UTC 
*** Bug 129042 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 40 Elijah Newren 2004-02-24 00:53:25 UTC 
*** Bug 135224 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 41 Elijah Newren 2004-07-17 16:54:58 UTC 
*** Bug 146676 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 42 Elijah Newren 2004-07-17 16:56:12 UTC 
*** Bug 136838 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 43 Elijah Newren 2004-07-17 16:56:22 UTC 
*** Bug 136981 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 44 Elijah Newren 2004-07-17 16:56:33 UTC 
*** Bug 139213 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 45 Elijah Newren 2004-07-17 16:56:44 UTC 
*** Bug 140656 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 46 Elijah Newren 2004-07-17 16:56:55 UTC 
*** Bug 146078 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 47 Olav Vitters 2005-04-23 21:36:42 UTC 
*** Bug 301670 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 48 André Klapper 2006-10-05 12:50:51 UTC 
there have not been any duplicate for one and a half year now, and all of the duplicates listed here are about gnome <=2.2.

closing this bug report as obsolete, please anybody reopen if this issue can still be reproduced with a current gnome release like 2.16.

thanks everybody.