After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 94698 - [PATCH] aspell
[PATCH] aspell
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Product: balsa
Classification: Other
Component: general
2.0.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Balsa Maintainers
Balsa Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-10-02 15:54 UTC by Christian Neumair
Modified: 2009-08-15 18:40 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
pspell -> aspell API (13.74 KB, patch)
2002-10-02 15:55 UTC, Christian Neumair
none Details | Review

Description Christian Neumair 2002-10-02 15:54:40 UTC
At the moment balsa depends on pspell which is really out-of-date.
Dear developers, please consider the move to aspell!
I prepared some patch, please check it and tell me whether it's ok to
commit it.

see you,
 Chris
Comment 1 Christian Neumair 2002-10-02 15:55:58 UTC
Created attachment 11358 [details] [review]
pspell -> aspell API
Comment 2 Pawel Salek 2002-10-02 22:51:08 UTC
The patch looks ok to me. Few "but"s:
1. "Could not find a working Aspell library" is not particularly
informative.
2. on my system, instalation of aspell-devel requires pspell-devel anyway.
3. existence of new_aspell_speller is being checked but
aspell-0.33.7.1-16 does not appear to define it. This was a
show-stopper for me.

Actually, I am quite annoyed with pspell, the question is whether
aspell is any better - but I cannot answer it.
Comment 3 Christian Neumair 2002-10-03 16:23:11 UTC
let's go through your points:
1. I'll change it to the standard form
2. + 3. Your packages are heavily outdated. Look at http://aspell.net,
Section Quick Links -> Manual -> Chapter 2.5.4. If you are annoyed
with other *spell solutions, look up chapter 1.1.1.

see you,
 Chris
Comment 4 Pawel Salek 2002-10-07 12:35:51 UTC
Thanks for the comments. The only problem I see now is that applying
this patch would force all balsa users to upgrade aspell. All users
would be forced, even those who do not use spelling.
I cannot say now whether this would be a big problem, or not.
Comment 5 Per Jonsson 2002-11-06 16:38:54 UTC
The patch does not appear to work with 2.0.3

>patch -Np1 -i /home/dexter/balsa-aspell-patch
>patching file configure.in
>patching file src/balsa-app.c
>Hunk #2 succeeded at 405 (offset 4 lines).
>patching file src/balsa-app.h
>Hunk #1 succeeded at 97 (offset 3 lines).
>patching file src/pref-manager.c
>Hunk #1 FAILED at 2196.
>1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file >src/pref-manager.c.rej
>patching file src/save-restore.c
>Hunk #1 succeeded at 666 (offset 12 lines).
>patching file src/spell-check.c
>patching file src/spell-check.h

And then configure bails out saying

>checking for scrollkeeper-config... >/opt/gnome2/bin/scrollkeeper-config
>checking for new_pspell_manager in -lpspell... no
>configure: error: *** libpspell(-devel) not found.  Please check
>http://www.balsa.net for information on the required files.
Comment 6 Pawel Salek 2002-12-21 09:37:16 UTC
BALSA_2 branch can work now with aspell>=0.50. I mark the report as fixed.
Comment 7 Pawel Salek 2003-01-29 21:19:44 UTC
balsa-2.0.6 released.