After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 85620 - [doc] Update docs for Delete panel confirmation message
[doc] Update docs for Delete panel confirmation message
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gnome-panel
Classification: Other
Component: docs
2.0.x
Other All
: Normal minor
: ---
Assigned To: John Fleck
Panel Maintainers
Depends on: 82586
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-06-17 15:28 UTC by Calum Benson
Modified: 2015-03-24 13:00 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.0

Attachments
delete dialog window title (554 bytes, patch)
2002-06-28 14:30 UTC, Glynn Foster 		none Details | Review

Description Calum Benson 2002-06-17 15:28:19 UTC 
The following issues came out of the recent ui-review and are recommended
for fixing prior to GNOME 2.0.1:

- We have the word 'removed' in the message that appears when you select
"Delete Panel".  s/removed/deleted, and s/Ok/Delete on the button.  

- The 'delete panel' message box should have no title according to the HIG;
if this isn't technically possible then it should be "Delete Panel", not
"Question".
Comment 1 Luis Villa 2002-06-18 20:54:22 UTC 
Adding keywords to all ui-review bugs in one mass change, sorry for the spam. It
would be very nice if the folks doing UI review stuff would be sure to add
'PATCH' to the bugs that have those. I'm (tentatively) not marking these 'high'
but the release team [having gotten approval from the docs and i18n people]
would like to see these in ASAP on the 2.0.1 branches, so that i18n folks can
start translating at their convenience.
Comment 2 Glynn Foster 2002-06-28 14:30:37 UTC 
Created attachment 9496 [details] [review]
delete dialog window title
Comment 3 Glynn Foster 2002-06-28 14:31:31 UTC 
Again, most of the patch is already in 82586. Need to add the window
title though, as above.
Comment 4 Luis Villa 2002-06-28 16:52:46 UTC 
After¦some¦discussion¦with¦the¦release¦team,¦in¦order¦to¦get¦these¦in¦to¦2.0.1
and¦to¦not¦make¦the¦translators¦shoot¦us,¦these¦need¦to¦get¦in¦ASAP¦:)¦I'm
marking¦them¦'urgent'/2.0.1¦as¦a¦result;¦it¦would¦be¦greatly¦appreciated¦if
maintainers¦of¦the¦affected¦components¦can¦work¦on¦getting¦these¦patched¦ASAP¦so
that¦the¦translators¦can¦get¦cracking¦on¦them¦for¦the¦next¦release.¦[Subject,¦of
course,¦to¦maintainer¦agreement¦with¦the¦goals¦of¦the¦review¦:)¦
Comment 5 Mark McLoughlin 2002-07-01 06:15:09 UTC 
Fixed in CVS.
Comment 6 Glynn Foster 2002-07-05 17:40:43 UTC 
reopening for bugs
Comment 7 Glynn Foster 2002-07-08 09:07:00 UTC 
i mean docs :/
Comment 8 Mark McLoughlin 2002-07-19 02:45:10 UTC 
Trimming keywords, changing priority and re-titling for clarity
Comment 9 Eugene O'Connor 2002-08-06 10:03:06 UTC 
This bug does not require doc changes.