After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 83304 - Button1-click on window frame should not always raise the window
Button1-click on window frame should not always raise the window
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 86108
Product: metacity
Classification: Other
Component: general
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Metacity maintainers list
Metacity maintainers list
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-05-28 21:35 UTC by oa
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: Unversioned Enhancement



Description oa 2002-05-28 21:35:18 UTC
While I really hate to suggest a new option, this has been bugging me ever
since I moved from sawfish to metacity on my gnome2 test machine
(originally because sawfish2 is way too unstable, but I wouldn't want to
move back even if it wasn't, exactly because metacity is simpler to use
thanks to fewer options)..

I need a way to be able to click inside windows without them being raised
automatically. Even if #80984 and #80298 were resolved, I'd still find
myself clicking widgets in windows that I do not want to be raised to the
front. So I need a way to make clicks on the window border only (not the
entire frame) raise the window.

Maybe it's just me, but I'd think this is a natural way of using mouse
focus mode. If I can focus a window that's not the topmost and type into
it, I should be able to also click in it (for example to focus the right
widget to type into). Given that, if it was just me, I'd tie this feature
to the focus mode.
Comment 1 Luis Villa 2002-05-30 22:32:30 UTC
Marking enhancement. That said, if one can type in a non-raised window
if it somehow gets focus, being able to click on it /does/ make sense
to me.
Comment 2 Bugtraq+/Bugzilla Gateway 2002-07-30 16:25:52 UTC
This looks like a dup of 86108.

My .0199 Euro and a few external beta testers indicates that this
really should be a preference.  
Comment 3 Luis Villa 2002-07-30 20:46:37 UTC
Yah. The 0.199 euro should be added in 86108, FWIW. 

[oa@: I'm only marking this a dup because the other bug has a lot of
discussion and a PATCH. Thanks for filing it.]

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 86108 ***